The Response of Cyclic Electron Flow around Photosystem I to Changes in Photorespiration and Nitrate Assimilation

Abstract

Photosynthesis captures light energy to produce ATP and NADPH. These molecules are consumed in the conversion of CO 2 to sugar, photorespiration, and NO 3 2 assimilation. The production and consumption of ATP and NADPH must be balanced to prevent photoinhibition or photodamage. This balancing may occur via cyclic electron flow around photosystem I (CEF), which increases ATP/NADPH production during photosynthetic electron transport; however, it is not clear under what conditions CEF changes with ATP/NADPH demand. Measurements of chlorophyll fluorescence and dark interval relaxation kinetics were used to determine the contribution of CEF in balancing ATP/NADPH in hydroponically grown Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) supplied different forms of nitrogen (nitrate versus ammonium) under changes in atmospheric CO 2 and oxygen. Measurements of CEF were made under low and high light and compared with ATP/NADPH demand estimated from CO 2 gas exchange. Under low light, contributions of CEF did not shift despite an up to 17% change in modeled ATP/NADPH demand. Under high light, CEF increased under photorespiratory conditions (high oxygen and low CO 2 ), consistent with a primary role in energy balancing. However, nitrogen form had little impact on rates of CEF under high or low light. We conclude that, according to modeled ATP/ NADPH demand, CEF responded to energy demand under high light but not low light. These findings suggest that other mechanisms, such as the malate valve and the Mehler reaction, were able to maintain energy balance when electron flow was low but that CEF was required under higher flow.Photosynthesis must balance both the amount of energy harvested by the light reactions and how it is stored to match metabolic demands. Light energy is harvested by the photosynthetic antenna complexes and stored by the electron and proton transfer complexes as ATP and NADPH. It is used primarily to meet the energy demands for assimilating carbon (from CO 2 ) and nitrogen (from NO 3 2 and NH 4 + ; Keeling et al., 1976;Edwards and Walker, 1983;Miller et al., 2007). These processes require different ratios of ATP and NADPH, requiring a finely balanced output of energy in these forms. For example, if ATP were to be consumed at a greater rate than NADPH, electron transport would rapidly become limiting by the lack of NADP + , decreasing rates of proton translocation and ATP regeneration. Alternatively, if NADPH were consumed faster than ATP, proton translocation through ATP synthase would be reduced due to limiting ADP and the difference in pH between lumen and stroma would increase, restricting plastoquinol oxidation at the cytochrome b 6 f complex and initiating nonphotochemical quenching (Kanazawa and Kramer, 2002). The stoichiometric balancing of ATP and NADPH must occur rapidly, because pool sizes of ATP and NADPH are relatively small and fluxes through primary metabolism are large (Noctor and Foyer, 2000;Avenson et al., 2005;Cruz et al., 2005;Amthor, 2010).The balancing of ATP and NADPH supply is further complicated...

A Method of Accounting for Enzyme Costs in Flux Balance Analysis Reveals Alternative Pathways and Metabolite Stores in an Illuminated Arabidopsis Leaf

“…This model prediction is consistent with experimental findings that CEF is only important under high light levels (Munekage et al, 2008;Walker et al, 2014). In a CEF mutant of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, the deficiency in CEF could be compensated by the combined effect of the mitochondrial ETC and WWC (Dang et al, 2014).…”

The Costs of Photorespiration to Food Production Now and in the Future

“…Studies have suggested that nitrate reduction in the cytosol is limited by reductant availability and that photorespiration provides reductant for nitrate assimilation by shuttling malate through the cytosol (32,34). Similarly, nitrate reduction could serve to consume excess electrons when the ATP:NADPH demand from the primary metabolism is higher than what is produced from the light reactions of photosynthesis (82). Such energy balancing between supply and demand is important to prevent photoinhibition of the light reactions, although other means of balancing the ATP/NADPH production ratio, such as photosystem I cyclic electron transport and the water-water cycle, are well established (41,59,87).…”

Dynamic photosynthesis under a fluctuating environment: a modelling-based analysis

“…The results of using an HPR of 12 was, as expected from previous studies (Yin et al, 2006;Walker et al, 2014), a decrease in the fraction of alternative electron transport, yielding a negligible cyclic electron flux around PSI and a low fraction of electrons allocated to alternative electron sinks. However, the model also predicted an increase in the flux of electrons consumed by the Calvin cycle.…”

“…Screening of mutant collections allowed the identification of NPQ mutants (Niyogi et al, 1998;Li et al, 2000b), whereas manipulations in gene expression (Niyogi et al, 2005) There are also strong limitations to the experimental study of cyclic electron transport and alternative electron sinks. Although several techniques are available for targeting different mechanisms Munekage et al, 2002;Driever and Baker, 2011;Walker et al, 2014;Strand et al, 2016a), these techniques do not provide a complete quantification of the different fluxes of electrons and their regulation in response to environmental conditions and rely on assumptions that are difficult to verify experimentally (Driever and Baker, 2011;Johnson, 2011;Walker et al, 2014;Fan et al, 2016).…”