2000
DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.3956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cloning and Characterization of Thermostable Endoglucanase (Cel8Y) from the Hyperthermophilic Aquifex aeolicus VF5

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2a), showing approximately 75% activity at 40∞C and 80∞C and less than 60% activity at a temperature above 90∞C. The optimal temperature of the enzyme was close to that previously reported from Bacillus sources, but lower than some thermophilic glucanases from thermophilic and ultra-thermophilic bacteria (Da Silva Aires et al, 2012;Kim et al, 2000;Koutsopoulos et al, 2005;Murray et al, 2001;Ueda et al, 2014). Thermostability assays (Fig.…”
Section: Characterization Of Recombinant Enzymesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…2a), showing approximately 75% activity at 40∞C and 80∞C and less than 60% activity at a temperature above 90∞C. The optimal temperature of the enzyme was close to that previously reported from Bacillus sources, but lower than some thermophilic glucanases from thermophilic and ultra-thermophilic bacteria (Da Silva Aires et al, 2012;Kim et al, 2000;Koutsopoulos et al, 2005;Murray et al, 2001;Ueda et al, 2014). Thermostability assays (Fig.…”
Section: Characterization Of Recombinant Enzymesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…HSH-810 (Kim et al 2005) isolated from other environments, whose endo-1,4-β-glucanases also manifest optimal activity at pH 7.0 and notable activity at a wide pH ranging from 4.5 to 10. However, these characteristics may apparently constitute an exception, because the rule is that bacterial endo-1,4-β-glucanases work at an optimal pH, but do not show activity at wide intervals of pH, as has been documented in Sporocytophaga myxococcoides (Goksoyr 1988), Pseudomonas fluorescens (Yamane et al 1970); Ruminiclostridium thermocellum (Romaniec et al 1992), Aquifex aeolicus (Kim et al 2000), Ruminococcus albus (Ohara et al 2000), Cellulomonas biazotea (Rajoka et al 2004), Clostridium cellulovorans (Arai et al 2006), Bacillus mycoides (Balasubramanian et al 2012), and Bacillus sp. (Harshvardhan et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the approach was successful in increasing the enzyme yield significantly, it did not have a dramatic effect on the process. Hence, we suggest the use of genetic engineering to enhance the production of this enzyme, whose applications for industrial enzymes [7], including endoglucanase cloning [4,16], are increasingly being reported. An alternate route is random mutagenesis, which historically has been proven to substantially enhance cellulase production by Trichoderma species [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%