2018
DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinicopathological and Molecular Characteristics of Mammary Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma With Adipocytic Differentiation With Emphasis on the Identification of a Novel BRAF Mutation

Abstract: Background/Aim: Adenoid cystic carcinoma accounts for fewer than 1% of all breast malignancies. Herein, we describe the clinicopathological characteristics and immunophenotype of mammary adenoid cystic carcinoma that exhibited adipocytic differentiation. Furthermore, we aimed to identify mutations potentially associated with this rare tumor. Case Report: A 52-year-old woman was referred to our Institution after detection of an incidental breast mass. The resected breast specimen contained a well-circumscribed,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DNA and RNA were quantified using the Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). DNA and RNA libraries were prepared as previously described (24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35). These DNA libraries were generated from 20 ng of DNA per sample using an Ion AmpliSeq Library Kit 2.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay v1 (OCA v1) panel (Thermo Fisher Scientific).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA and RNA were quantified using the Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). DNA and RNA libraries were prepared as previously described (24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35). These DNA libraries were generated from 20 ng of DNA per sample using an Ion AmpliSeq Library Kit 2.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay v1 (OCA v1) panel (Thermo Fisher Scientific).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sections (4-μm thick) cut from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were placed onto Superfrost Plus glass slides (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Thereafter, the sections were deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated through a series of graded alcohols and immunohistochemically stained using an automated Ventana Benchmark XT (Ventana Medical Systems Inc.) as described by the manufacturer (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13). Antigen was retrieved using CC1 Cell Conditioning Solution (Ventana Medical Systems Inc.).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 4 µm-thick, FFPE slices were de-paraffinized and rehydrated using a xylene and alcohol solution. Immunostaining was performed using automated instruments (Ventana Benchmark XT (Ventana Medical Systems) and or Dako Omnis (Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA)) [1,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. After antigen retrieval, the slices were incubated with primary antibodies including pan-cytokeratin (pan-CK; 1:600, clone AE1/AE3, Dako), CK7 (Dako, 1:100, clone OV-TL 12/30, Dako), CK20 (1:100, clone Ks20.8, Dako), caudal type homeobox 2 (CDX2; 1:400, clone EPR2764Y, Cell Marque, Rocklin, CA, USA), paired box 8 (PAX8; 1:50, polyclonal, Cell Marque), estrogen receptor (ER; 1:150, clone 6F11, Novocastra, Leica Biosystems, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK), progesterone receptor (PR; 1:100, clone 16, Novocastra), p53 (1:300, clone DO-7, Novocastra), p16 (prediluted, clone E6H4, Ventana Medical Systems), p63 (1:50, clone 4A4, Dako), and GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3; 1:150, clone L50-823, Cell Marque).…”
Section: Immunohistochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%