2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-009-1080-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinicopathologic Analysis of Ampullary Neoplasms in 450 Patients: Implications for Surgical Strategy and Long-Term Prognosis

Abstract: When surgery is indicated, radical resection is required for early invasive adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater, as lymph node metastases are present in nearly 30% of patients with T1 disease. Pancreaticoduodenectomy should be the preferred approach for most ampullary neoplasms that require surgical resection.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
139
3
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
8
139
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…We recognize that our current management algorithm for ampullary lesions, which includes EP, should be considered challenging at this stage because the occurrence rate of potentially life-threatening complications in patients receiving EP is reported to be markedly higher than in those who underwent endoscopic resection of gastric or colonic lesion, and the efficacy of EP remains unjustifiable [1][2][3][4] . Furthermore, it is uncertain which of the following should be applied for a salvage procedure when the ampullectomy margin is positive for tumor, i.e., repeat endoscopic resection, transduodenal resection, or PD [1][2][3][4] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We recognize that our current management algorithm for ampullary lesions, which includes EP, should be considered challenging at this stage because the occurrence rate of potentially life-threatening complications in patients receiving EP is reported to be markedly higher than in those who underwent endoscopic resection of gastric or colonic lesion, and the efficacy of EP remains unjustifiable [1][2][3][4] . Furthermore, it is uncertain which of the following should be applied for a salvage procedure when the ampullectomy margin is positive for tumor, i.e., repeat endoscopic resection, transduodenal resection, or PD [1][2][3][4] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it is uncertain which of the following should be applied for a salvage procedure when the ampullectomy margin is positive for tumor, i.e., repeat endoscopic resection, transduodenal resection, or PD [1][2][3][4] . Thus it is difficult to state that EP is an established treatment procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations