2017
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinicomanometric factors associated with clinically relevant esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction from the Sandhill high‐resolution manometry system

Abstract: Our results suggest that IRP of 20 mm Hg or higher could segregate clinically relevant subjects showing EGJOO in Sandhill HRM. Additionally, if subjects have both dysphagia and compartmentalized pressurization, careful follow-up is essential.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
48
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous study, patients with clinically relevant EGJOO had significantly higher rates of dysphagia (100% vs 24.3%, P < 0.001) and CP (85.7% vs 21.7%, P = 0.001) than those with nonclinically relevant EGJOO. 9 Of patients with EGJOO with both dysphagia and CP, 40% had clinically relevant EGJOO. The pre-dictive performance was a little disappointing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In a previous study, patients with clinically relevant EGJOO had significantly higher rates of dysphagia (100% vs 24.3%, P < 0.001) and CP (85.7% vs 21.7%, P = 0.001) than those with nonclinically relevant EGJOO. 9 Of patients with EGJOO with both dysphagia and CP, 40% had clinically relevant EGJOO. The pre-dictive performance was a little disappointing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…5 Median IRP 20 mmHg was adopted as cutoff for diagnosing EGJOO in Sandhill HRM with reference to previous studies. 9,[20][21][22] As a result, a total of 169 patients with EGJOO were included in the analysis. Clinically relevant patients were defined as follows: (1) subsequent HRM met achalasia criteria during follow-up (early achalasia); (2) Eckardt score was decreased at least two points without exceeding a score of 3 after pneumatic dilatation (variant achalasia); or (3) significant passage disturbance on esophagogram without structural abnormality (possible achalasia).…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Taft´s study evaluated ESS only in achalasia patients. Nevertheless, it has been used as a generic score for symptomatic burden evaluation in different esophageal conditions, including ineffective esophageal motility (IEM), esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO), and different spastic/hyper‐contractile disorders …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%