Fair reliability of eckardt scores in achalasia and non‐achalasia patients: Psychometric properties of the eckardt spanish version in a multicentric study

et al. 2021

Self Cite

Background Anxiety is a significant modulator of sensitivity along the GI tract. The recently described Esophageal Hypervigilance and Anxiety Score (EHAS) evaluates esophageal‐specific anxiety. The aims of this study were as follows: 1. translate and validate an international Spanish version of EHAS. 2. Evaluate its psychometric properties in a large Hispano‐American sample of symptomatic individuals. Methods A Spanish EHAS version was developed by a Delphi process and reverse translation. Patients referred for high‐resolution manometry (HRM) were recruited prospectively from seven Spanish and Latin American centers. Several scores were used: EHAS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Eckardt score (ES), Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire (GERDQ), and the Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire (BEDQ). Standardized psychometric analyses were performed. Key Results A total of 443 patients were recruited. Spanish EHAS showed excellent reliability (Cronbach´s alpha = 0.94). Factor analysis confirmed the presence of two factors, corresponding to the visceral anxiety and hypervigilance subscales. Sufficient convergent validity was shown by moderate significant correlations between EHAS and other symptomatic scores. Patients with high EHAS scores had significantly more dysphagia. There was no difference in EHAS scores when compared normal vs abnormal or major manometric diagnosis. Conclusions and Inferences A widely usable Spanish EHAS version has been validated. We confirm its excellent psychometric properties in our patients, confirming the appropriateness of its use in different populations. Our findings support the appropriateness of evaluating esophageal anxiety across the whole manometric diagnosis spectrum.

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Spanish version of the esophageal hypervigilance and anxiety score shows strong psychometric properties: Results of a large prospective multicenter study in Spain and Latin America

et al. 2021

Self Cite

“…In that study, Taft showed only fair reliability (with Cronbach's α and Guttmann statistic below 0.7) and validity of ES in achalasia patients. Cisternas et al recently reported that ES showed Cronbach's α of 0.57 and 0.65 in non‐achalasia and achalasia, respectively 12 . These studies question the appropriateness of ES use, as it has been suggested that a Cronbach's α > 0.7 is appropriate for clinical use 13…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation and psychometric evaluation of the Spanish version of Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire (BEDQ): Results of a multicentric study

et al. 2020

Self Cite

Background The recently developed Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire (BEDQ) evaluates esophageal obstructive symptoms. Its initial evaluation showed strong psychometric properties. The aims of this study were to (a) translate and validate an international Spanish version of BEDQ and (b) evaluate its psychometric properties in a large Hispano‐American sample of symptomatic individuals. Methods A Spanish BEDQ version was performed by Hispano‐American experts using a Delphi process and reverse translation. Patients were prospectively recruited from seven centers in Spain and Latin America among individuals referred for high‐resolution manometry (HRM). Patients completed several scores: Hospital Anxiety & Depression Scale (HADS), Eckardt score (ES), Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire (GERDQ), and the BEDQ. Standardized psychometric analyses were performed. Key Results A total of 426 patients were recruited. Spanish BEDQ showed excellent reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.91). Factor analysis confirmed its unidimensional character. Moderate significant correlations between BEDQ and other symptomatic scores were found, suggesting sufficient convergent validity. Patients with abnormal or obstructive HRM findings scored significantly higher when compared to normal or non‐obstructive findings, respectively. Using a cutoff of 10, BEDQ showed a sensitivity of 65.38% and a specificity of 66.21% and an area under the curve of 0.71 for obstructive or major manometric diagnosis. Conclusions and Inferences A widely usable Spanish BEDQ version has been validated. We confirm its excellent psychometric properties in our patients, confirming the appropriateness of its use in different populations.

“…The general consensus is that a PRO should have a Cronbach's alpha ≥0.7 to be used in clinical trials 4,28 . Our groups have recently published psychometric evaluations in large different populations, showing remarkable similar results, with Cronbach's alpha for ES between 0.57 and 0.67 14,15 and between 0.90 and 0.91 for BEDQ 18,19 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…Before performing the HRM, all patients filled forms for epidemiological data and responded to several symptomatic scores, including the ES, Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire (GERDQ), and BEDQ. We used validated Spanish language versions for all the questionnaires 15,19,20 . Reason for referral was extracted from the referring physician's order.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The ES has been extensively used to define response to different achalasia treatments 7‐9 and, even though it was designed to be an achalasia‐specific tool, it has been repeatedly used in nonachalasia conditions including Ineffective Esophageal Motility (IEM), 10 Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction (EGJOO) 11 and different spastic/hypercontractile disorders 12,13 . Despite the ES's wide use, its psychometric properties have only been evaluated by two recent studies, both showing fair reliability 14,15 . In their latest achalasia guidelines, both the American College of Gastroenterology and the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy have acknowledged limitations of the ES 5,16,17 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire shows better discriminative capacity for clinical and manometric findings than the Eckardt score: Results from a multicenter study

et al. 2021

Self Cite

Introduction Grading dysphagia is crucial for clinical management of patients. The Eckardt score (ES) is the most commonly used for this purpose. We aimed to compare the ES with the recently developed Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire (BEDQ) in terms of their correlation and discriminative capacity for clinical and manometric findings and evaluate the effect of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms on both. Methods Symptomatic patients referred for high‐resolution manometry (HRM) were prospectively recruited from seven centers in Spain and Latin America. Clinical data and several scores (ES, BEDQ, GERDQ) were collected and contrasted to HRM findings. Standard statistical analysis was performed. Key Results 426 patients were recruited, 31.2% and 41.5% being referred exclusively for dysphagia and GERD symptoms, respectively. Both BEDQ and ES were independently associated with achalasia. Only BEDQ was independently associated with being referred for dysphagia and with relevant HRM findings. ROC curve analysis for achalasia diagnosis showed AUC of 0.809 for BEDQ and 0.765 for ES, with the main difference being higher BEDQ sensitivity (80.0% vs 70.8% for ES). GERDQ independently predicted ES but not BEDQ. In the absence of dysphagia (BEDQ = 0), GERD symptoms significantly determine ES. Conclusions and Inferences Our study suggests both the BEDQ and ES can complementarily describe symptomatic burden in achalasia. BEDQ has several advantages over the ES in the dysphagia evaluation, basically due to its higher sensitivity for manometric diagnosis and independence of GERD symptoms. ES should be used as an achalasia‐specific metric, while BEDQ is a better symptom‐generic evaluating tool.