2020
DOI: 10.3892/etm.2020.8895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical value and application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign breast lesions

Abstract: The aim of the present study was to assess the performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in distinguishing between malignant and benign breast lesions and the diagnostic value of its clinical application. A total of 52 cases with malignant breast tumors and 73 cases with benign breast lesions were included in the study. Time-intensity curves (TICs) for contrast-enhanced ultrasound were recorded, and the perfusion parameters were obtained and analyzed. Typical features of malignant breast tumors included irre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(21 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the CEUS group in this experimental study, the AT of the benign lesion group (9.84 ± 2.50 s) was earlier than that of the malignant lesion group(12.59 ± 2.35 s). This significant difference between the two groups was consistent with the findings reported by Zhang et al, [29] Zhang, [10] and Tang. [30] The time required for the contrast agent to reach the lung lesion and adjacent lung tissue is affected by many factors, including heart function, lung disease, contrast agent injection speed, and other individual differences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In the CEUS group in this experimental study, the AT of the benign lesion group (9.84 ± 2.50 s) was earlier than that of the malignant lesion group(12.59 ± 2.35 s). This significant difference between the two groups was consistent with the findings reported by Zhang et al, [29] Zhang, [10] and Tang. [30] The time required for the contrast agent to reach the lung lesion and adjacent lung tissue is affected by many factors, including heart function, lung disease, contrast agent injection speed, and other individual differences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…We noticed that 11 studies, 17,19,20,23,25,[29][30][31]33,35,37 recruited participants who were known to have the target disease and healthy control participants, which might have resulted in a spectrum bias. Nine studies 17,18,[22][23][24][26][27][28]30 in this meta-analysis might also have been subject to a review bias, 38 as they were not clear about whether the investigators who interpreted the index test were "blinded" to the reference test result. Nine studies 16,[19][20][21][22][23]31,35,37 used mixed reference standards (either histologic examination or follow-up) for renal cancer diagnosis.…”
Section: Characteristics and Quality Assessment Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%