2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-022-07684-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical testing on SARS-CoV-2 swab samples using reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP)

Abstract: Background High cost of commercial RNA extraction kits limits the testing efficiency of SARS-CoV-2. Here, we developed a simple nucleic acid extraction method for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 directly from nasopharyngeal swab samples. Methods A pH sensitive dye was used as the end point detection method. The obvious colour changes between positive and negative reactions eliminates the need of other equipment. Results … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Out of all these isothermal techniques, RT-LAMP has been most extensively compared to RT-PCR using parameters such as sample pre-treatment (RT-LAMP is more flexible to biological and chemical inhibitors than RT-PCR), analytical time and robustness (RT-LAMP amplification takes less than 30 min, unlike RT-PCR, which takes >3 h), and assay efficacy (RT-LAMP nears the sensitivity of RT-PCR, which is 68-80% sensitive and 90-95% specific, according to WHO guidelines). These characteristics make RT-LAMP equivalent to RT-PCR and pave the way for developing RT-LAMP-based POC technological biosensor platforms [8,17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of all these isothermal techniques, RT-LAMP has been most extensively compared to RT-PCR using parameters such as sample pre-treatment (RT-LAMP is more flexible to biological and chemical inhibitors than RT-PCR), analytical time and robustness (RT-LAMP amplification takes less than 30 min, unlike RT-PCR, which takes >3 h), and assay efficacy (RT-LAMP nears the sensitivity of RT-PCR, which is 68-80% sensitive and 90-95% specific, according to WHO guidelines). These characteristics make RT-LAMP equivalent to RT-PCR and pave the way for developing RT-LAMP-based POC technological biosensor platforms [8,17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These characteristics place RT-LAMP as equivalent to qRT-PCR and lead the way towards developing a RT-LAMP based PoC setup. [16,17] Modifications to the amplification product (amplicon) during reaction with isothermal amplification techniques (LAMP and RPA) have been demonstrated. Introduction of biotin and FITC/FAM labels [18], enabling the readout on a paper-based, sensitive immunochromatographic Lateral Flow Assay (LFA) platform were achieved with high efficacy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%