2014
DOI: 10.11607/ijp.3776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Survival of Anterior Metal-Ceramic and All-Ceramic Cantilever Resin-Bonded Fixed Dental Prostheses over a Period of 60 Months

Abstract: This assignment applies to all translations of the Work as well as to preliminary display/posting of the abstract of the accepted article in electronic form before publication. If any changes in authorship (order, deletions, or additions) occur after the manuscript is submitted, agreement by all authors for such changes must be on file with the Publisher. An author's name may be removed only at his/her written request. (Note: Material prepared by employees of the US government in the course of their official d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of this follow‐up time, many longitudinal studies were excluded. Although these studies had a title indicating a follow‐up time of more than 5 years, when reviewed closely, these studies actually exhibited shorter mean follow‐up times . In many of the excluded studies, some prostheses involved a follow‐up time of >5 years, but the others were only followed‐up for a few months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of this follow‐up time, many longitudinal studies were excluded. Although these studies had a title indicating a follow‐up time of more than 5 years, when reviewed closely, these studies actually exhibited shorter mean follow‐up times . In many of the excluded studies, some prostheses involved a follow‐up time of >5 years, but the others were only followed‐up for a few months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the current clinical studies showed that cantilever design RBFDPs are superior than two retainer design in the anterior region . However, there are limited number of RCTs and CCTs in the literature, so the level of evidence of this result is mainly from cohort studies as mentioned before in the previous review articles …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the current clinical studies showed that cantilever design RBFDPs are superior than two-retainers design in the anterior region. 29,[32][33][34][35][36][46][47][48] However, there are limited number of RCTs and CCTs in the literature; therefore, the level of evidence of this result is mainly from cohort studies as mentioned before in the previous review articles. 15,16 In addition, none of the studies in the literature reported the type of functional occlusion of the patients or matched the results of their studies with this variety.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; Saker et al. ; Sasse & Kern ). Apart from these, minimal‐invasiveness, lower costs, and treatment time offer further advantages over traditional FDPs and SCIs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%