1999
DOI: 10.1080/010503999424842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical study of Widex Senso on first-time hearing aid users

Abstract: Using psychoacoustic tests and questionnaires, the aim of this study was to clinically test Widex Senso (WS) versus analogue hearing aids on 200 first-time wearers. Half of the participants were selected at random for fitting with the behind-the-ear model (WS C8) or the in-the-canal model (WS CX). On a group basis, WS was found to provide more benefit than a palette of 29 analogue, modern hearing aid models from 10 manufacturers. Only 3 of 100 subjects changed from WS to another hearing aid. On average, the ab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be explained by the polar pattern of the omnidirectional microphone of this PSAD, which has sound sensibility from all the incidence angles, and in this case, the noise processing (in 180º azimuth) may have impaired speech recognition (in 0º azimuth). These results also suggest that the noise reduction algorithm of the PSAD, working alone, may not be efficient to improve the S/N ratio for the user, matching observations from other authors [14][15][16]38,39 . Thus, it is important that the user be advised in relation to the real expectations when using such technology 40 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This can be explained by the polar pattern of the omnidirectional microphone of this PSAD, which has sound sensibility from all the incidence angles, and in this case, the noise processing (in 180º azimuth) may have impaired speech recognition (in 0º azimuth). These results also suggest that the noise reduction algorithm of the PSAD, working alone, may not be efficient to improve the S/N ratio for the user, matching observations from other authors [14][15][16]38,39 . Thus, it is important that the user be advised in relation to the real expectations when using such technology 40 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Studies developed with the aim of assessing noise reduction algorithms show conflicting results. Some authors find improvements in the clinical evaluation of speech in the presence of noise when noise reduction algorithms are used, [11][12][13]8 while others find improvements only on self-assessment questionnaires [14][15][16] . Another way to improve speech perception in the presence of noise is to use directional microphones, which have different sensitiveness according to the sound wave incidence angle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The threshold is calculated as the mean value of the medians of the remaining upper and lower turning points, and presented with the resolution of 1 dB. These parameters should give high accuracy with a standard deviation of repeated measures not exceeding 1.8 dB[14].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These parameters should give a high threshold resolution with a standard deviation of repeated measures not exceeding 1.8 dB. [17] Psychoacoustical modulation transfer function…”
Section: Tone Thresholds With Fixed Frequency Békésy Technique -Audiomentioning
confidence: 99%