The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19981101)83:9<2030::aid-cncr21>3.3.co;2-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical significance of Philadelphia chromosome positive pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the context of contemporary intensive therapies

Abstract: The findings of the current study confirm that Ph chromosome positivity represents a significant independent adverse risk factor for childhood ALL that has not been abrogated by current intensive chemotherapy programs. BMT at the time of first remission, as well as other alternative strategies employing biotherapeutic agents, should be considered in future front-line trials for pediatric patients with Ph+ ALL.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The risks of slow response might to some extent be overcome by increased therapy intensity; in the CCG experience with HR-ALL and slow early response as evaluated on the day 7 bone marrow, the outcome was improved by augmented post-induction chemotherapy [33]. Certain cytogenetic changes have been established with very poor outcome: the Philadelphia translocation t(9;22) [38,39], the t(4;11) or MLL-gene rearrangement [40,41], as well as hypodiploidy [42,43]. Our patients with t(9;22) benefited from stem cell transplantation in 1CR (9-year EFS 55% vs. 17% for chemotherapy, P ¼ 0.02) although these groups were small (19 SCT vs. 6 chemo).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The risks of slow response might to some extent be overcome by increased therapy intensity; in the CCG experience with HR-ALL and slow early response as evaluated on the day 7 bone marrow, the outcome was improved by augmented post-induction chemotherapy [33]. Certain cytogenetic changes have been established with very poor outcome: the Philadelphia translocation t(9;22) [38,39], the t(4;11) or MLL-gene rearrangement [40,41], as well as hypodiploidy [42,43]. Our patients with t(9;22) benefited from stem cell transplantation in 1CR (9-year EFS 55% vs. 17% for chemotherapy, P ¼ 0.02) although these groups were small (19 SCT vs. 6 chemo).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The recent demonstration that TERF2 inhibits ATM at telomeric ends (Karlseder et al, 2004) also suggests that it acts, at least in part, independently of telomerase (Ancelin et al, 2002). Children with a BCR-ABL positive or RUNX1 amplified ALL do poorly on current treatment protocols (Uckun et al, 1998;Robinson et al, 2003). It may be possible to therapeutically exploit the overexpression of TERF2 in this subset of childhood ALL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the high rates of relapse and rapid development of drug resistance in patients with Ph+ ALL, only approximately 10% of patients experience long‐term benefits from standard combination chemotherapy alone (Dombret et al , 2002; Gleissner et al , 2002; Kantarjian et al , 2004). The frequency of the Ph chromosome increases with increasing age, from approximately 3% in children and adolescents, to 22% among adult patients aged 21–50 years, and 44% in patients aged more than 50 years, making it the most common cytogenetic abnormality in adult ALL (Secker‐Walker et al , 1991; Uckun et al , 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%