2003
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.10461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome of children with high‐risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (HR‐ALL): Nordic results on an intensive regimen with restricted central nervous system irradiation

Abstract: HR-ALL was successfully treated on the NOPHO-92 regimen, with a relatively low CNS relapse rate for non-irradiated children. WBC > or =200 x 10(9)/L and very slow response emerged as strong poor prognostic factors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6,22 Finnish results compare favorably with those in Europe. 25 That the results for young adults treated with adult ALL protocols in Finland are comparable to those treated with pediatric protocols is remarkable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…6,22 Finnish results compare favorably with those in Europe. 25 That the results for young adults treated with adult ALL protocols in Finland are comparable to those treated with pediatric protocols is remarkable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Three different treatment protocols were used for the pediatric intermediate risk group during the study period: BFM-83 IR (n=9), 13 NOPHO ALL-92 IR (n=40) 22 and NOPHO ALL-2000 IR (n=7), whereas two protocols were used for the high risk group: Nalle-90 HR (n=49) 6,22 and NOPHO ALL-2000 HR (n=23). The NOPHO IR protocols consisted of induction, consolidation, delayed intensification and maintenance, the total duration of treatment being 2 to 2.5 years.…”
Section: Treatment Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4,6,22 The risk group assignment was based on age and white blood cell count (WBC) at diagnosis (standard risk (SR): age 2.0-9.9 years and WBC o10.0 Â 10 9 /l; intermediate risk (IR): age 1.0-1.9 or X10.0 years and/or WBC 10-49.9 Â 10 9 /l; higher risk (that is, HR or very high risk (VHR)): WBCX50.0 Â 10 9 /l) and the presence of higher risk features: Tlineage ALL, the presence of CNS or testicular involvement, translocations t(9;22)(q34;q11) or t(4;11)(q21;q23), lymphomatous leukemia or mediastinal lymphoma, and/or a poor treatment response (M3 BM at day 15 or M2/M3 at day 29). 4 Patients who had higher risk features were assigned to the VHR treatment arm, if they were at least 5 years of age at diagnosis (because of the use of cranial irradiation in that protocol arm) and in addition had (i) T-cell disease with one or more additional HR-features, (ii) CNS leukemia, (iii) lymphomatous leukemia and/or (iv) higher risk ALL at diagnosis and a day 15 M3 or a day 29 M2/M3 bone marrow.…”
Section: Nopho All-92 Risk Groupingmentioning
confidence: 99%