2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical significance of parotid gland incidentalomas on 18F-FDG PET/CT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result of more frequent application of PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) for staging and follow-up of various malignancies, there are more PET/CT reports about abnormal 18F-FDG uptake in unexpected locations such like the parotid gland ( 27 ). FDG-positive parotid incidentalomas occur in less than 14% of PET/CT scans, of which only 4% are malignant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result of more frequent application of PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) for staging and follow-up of various malignancies, there are more PET/CT reports about abnormal 18F-FDG uptake in unexpected locations such like the parotid gland ( 27 ). FDG-positive parotid incidentalomas occur in less than 14% of PET/CT scans, of which only 4% are malignant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Warthin’s tumor seems to be the most frequent histology of parotid incidentalomas and show the highest mean standardized uptake value (SUV max ). Nevertheless, PET/CT is unable to differentiate benign from malignant parotid lesions based on SUV max alone ( 27 ). Due to the low frequency of malignant incidentalomas, their management can be performed as for any benign parotid tumor, i.e., FNAC is recommended as a next step.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-sectional imaging including CT, MRI and PET are increasingly utilized for evaluation of head and neck clinical problems, increasing the probability of discovering asymptomatic parotid lesions. The prevalence of these lesions is not known on CT and MRI, however their prevalence on PET imaging has been reported in the range of 0.3-0.45 % with reported incidence of malignancy up to 32 % of these lesions [7,9,10]. Knowledge of the risk of malignancy in these incidental lesions will aid the interpreting radiologist and referring physician in counseling patients prior to referral for percutaneous biopsy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More data is available concerning SIs on PET/CT. The frequency of incidental findings on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT scans showing 18F-FDG uptake in parotid glands ranged from 0.4% to 1.73% [23][24][25]. Only 4 % of focal parotid incidental uptake (FPIU) turned out to be malignant in the study group of Makis et al [24] and 9.6% in the metaanalysis of Treglia et al [26].…”
Section: Chances Of Detecting Sismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency of incidental findings on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT scans showing 18F-FDG uptake in parotid glands ranged from 0.4% to 1.73% [23][24][25]. Only 4 % of focal parotid incidental uptake (FPIU) turned out to be malignant in the study group of Makis et al [24] and 9.6% in the metaanalysis of Treglia et al [26]. However, Ustun et al [25] reported an incidence of parotid metastases amounting to 36.4% and similarly high values of 45% were reported by Mabray et al [27], where FPIU was frequently a manifestation of the patient's known malignancy (metastasis or lymphoma).…”
Section: Chances Of Detecting Sismentioning
confidence: 99%