2013
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical significance of electrocardiographic right ventricular hypertrophy in athletes: comparison with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and pulmonary hypertension

Abstract: Electrocardiographic voltage criteria for RVH are frequently fulfilled in healthy athletes without underlying RV pathology, and should not prompt further evaluation if observed in isolation. Recognition of this phenomenon should reduce the burden of investigations after pre-participation ECG screening without compromising sensitivity for disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
42
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of our long-standing experience of evaluating several thousand athletes and in line with recent consensus documents and research findings, 7,12,14,15,17,19,20,26 we identified certain ECG anomalies (borderline variants; Figure 1A) currently included in the group 2 category of the ESC recommendations and some deemed abnormal by the Seattle criteria that we would now consider normal variants in asymptomatic athletes without a relevant family history or abnormal cardiac examination. Specifically, we would not recommend further investigation of athletes with any one of the following ECG patterns when present either in isolation or in association with recognized training-related ECG changes: (1) left atrial enlargement, (2) right atrial enlargement, (3) left axis deviation, (4) right axis deviation, and (5) Sokolow-Lyon voltage criteria for right ventricular hypertrophy.…”
Section: Refined Ecg Criteriasupporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the basis of our long-standing experience of evaluating several thousand athletes and in line with recent consensus documents and research findings, 7,12,14,15,17,19,20,26 we identified certain ECG anomalies (borderline variants; Figure 1A) currently included in the group 2 category of the ESC recommendations and some deemed abnormal by the Seattle criteria that we would now consider normal variants in asymptomatic athletes without a relevant family history or abnormal cardiac examination. Specifically, we would not recommend further investigation of athletes with any one of the following ECG patterns when present either in isolation or in association with recognized training-related ECG changes: (1) left atrial enlargement, (2) right atrial enlargement, (3) left axis deviation, (4) right axis deviation, and (5) Sokolow-Lyon voltage criteria for right ventricular hypertrophy.…”
Section: Refined Ecg Criteriasupporting
confidence: 57%
“…13 New data based on large athlete cohorts from our group have revealed several isolated ECG patterns to have a low diagnostic yield for cardiac disease, questioning their relevance as markers of pathology in elite athletes. 14,15 Current guidelines in practice are consensus based and do not fully incorporate such scientific observations in their recommendations. Furthermore, they are derived almost exclusively from unselected white athletes (WAs) 16 and have not been evaluated in large cohorts of elite athletes of African/Afro-Caribbean origin (black athletes; BAs).…”
Section: Editorial See P 1626 Clinical Perspective On P 1649mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Athletes of Afro-Caribbean origin, who comprised 20% of Sheikh's study group, are more likely to present TWI than are Caucasians [10,27]. Many publications based on additional tests such as echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance revealed that TWI is closely associated with cardiac diseases, particularly with HCM [28][29][30][31]. In the cited paper, the TWI was present in 97% of athletes with diagnosed HCM [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Current European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend that Sokolow-Lyon RVH should prompt further assessment for 'pathological RV dilatation/ hypertrophy' in young athletes [3]. Nevertheless, a recent study in asymptomatic young athletes demonstrated that Sokolow-Lyon RVH was present in around one in eight athletes, indicating that such a strategy would be associated with an unacceptably high rate of false positive screening outcomes [16]. In an attempt to reduce the number of false positives, the more recently proposed Seattle criteria for athlete ECG interpretation suggest that Sokolow-Lyon RVH should be accompanied by right-axis deviation N 120°before further investigation is initiated [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%