1987
DOI: 10.1177/00220345870660082501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Results After 12 Months from a Study of the Incidence and Progression of Dental Caries in Relation to Consumption of Chewing-gum Containing Xylitol in School Preventive Programs

Abstract: This study was designed to evaluate the effect of chewing-gum containing xylitol on the incidence and the progression of dental caries. A sample of 433 children, aged 8 and 9 years, of low socio-economic status and high caries rate, was divided into two experimental groups (15% or 65% xylitol chewing-gum distributed three times a day at school) and one control group (without chewing-gum). The three groups were exposed to the same basic preventive program. Children who chewed gum had a significantly smaller DMF… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
7

Year Published

1989
1989
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
25
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The occurrence of S. mutans in the saliva or plaque of the subjects ra ther accurately followed this same pattern: the more frequently xylitol gums were used per day, the stronger the reduction in the numbers of S. mutans. It may be possible to draw a similar conclusion from the study of Kandelman and Gagnon [1987]: when the frequency of use was similar, 65% xylitol gum pro duced slightly better clinical results than 15% xylitol gum. Based on the proposed mechanism of action of xylitol, it is only logical to assume that such a dosedependent relationship exists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The occurrence of S. mutans in the saliva or plaque of the subjects ra ther accurately followed this same pattern: the more frequently xylitol gums were used per day, the stronger the reduction in the numbers of S. mutans. It may be possible to draw a similar conclusion from the study of Kandelman and Gagnon [1987]: when the frequency of use was similar, 65% xylitol gum pro duced slightly better clinical results than 15% xylitol gum. Based on the proposed mechanism of action of xylitol, it is only logical to assume that such a dosedependent relationship exists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…On the other hand, both animal and human studies have shown XYL to be anticario genic or perhaps therapeutic, these effects manifest ing themselves in a dose-or frequency-dependent manner [Scheinin et al, 1975a, b;Galiullin, 1981;Kandelman and Gagnon, 1987;Isokangas et al, 1988]. The anticariogenic effect has been demon strated even with an approximately 1:4 mixture of XYL (15%) and SOR (50%), although a higher amount of XYL (65%) only resulted in a stronger anticariogenic effect [Kandelman and Gagnon, 1987], Plaque studies involving chewing gums with XYL/ SOR ratios varying from 1:4 to 7:1 have, as a rule, reduced the amount of plaque [Rekola et al, 1980;Birkhed et al, 1983;Topitsoglou et al, 1983;Kandel man and Gagnon, 1987]. In a short-term plaque study, the effect of a XYL/SOR gum containing only 17.3% XYL (XYL/SOR = 1:3) on the amount of plaque was as beneficial as that of a gum containing 64.5% XYL [Topitsoglou et al, 1983].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…' The results of a similarly-designed (although not blind) field study in Montreal showed that children who chewed xylitol gum had significantly lower net progression of caries than the control group children after 24 months, and a significant number of reversals of carious lesions were seen in the test group suggesting that remineralisation had occurred. 19 A series of double blind clinical studies carried out in Belize approximately 10 years ago were the first to provide direct comparisons between xylitol and sorbitol gums. 27,28,30,31 Before this study, trials of xylitol-containing gum had given superior results to trials of sorbitol-containing gums, but they had not been compared in the same trial.…”
Section: Evidence From Clinical Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%