2008
DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e31816b3ed1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Relevance of Pretransplant Donor-Directed Antibodies Detected by Single Antigen Beads in Highly Sensitized Renal Transplant Patients

Abstract: This single-center study showed that in the AM program DDA detected by SA, and not by less-sensitive methods, may be related to acute rejection episodes but is not detrimental to long-term graft outcome. These findings question the increasing use of more-sensitive screening techniques for the allocation of organs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
83
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
5
83
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Categorization of deceased donor kidney transplant recipients at risk for early graft failure was not based on Luminex-detected DSA since several reports indicate that donor-specific HLA antibodies detected exclusively by the highly sensitive Luminex technology are not necessarily associated with graft rejection [30][31][32]. In addition, definition of unacceptable HLA antigens by Luminex technology may put the deceased donor kidney transplant candidate at a disadvantage due to prolonged waiting time.…”
Section: Identification Of High-risk Sensitized Patientsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Categorization of deceased donor kidney transplant recipients at risk for early graft failure was not based on Luminex-detected DSA since several reports indicate that donor-specific HLA antibodies detected exclusively by the highly sensitive Luminex technology are not necessarily associated with graft rejection [30][31][32]. In addition, definition of unacceptable HLA antigens by Luminex technology may put the deceased donor kidney transplant candidate at a disadvantage due to prolonged waiting time.…”
Section: Identification Of High-risk Sensitized Patientsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The major advantage of Luminex technology in anti-HLA antibody detection, especially using SA analysis, is the accurate evaluation of complex sera from highly immunized patients for whom it is very difficult to identify antibody specificity and, therefore, find a compatible donor [23,24]. Each anti-HLA antibody may bind multiple epitopes, structurally defined by few amino-acid residues common to several class I and II HLA molecules [25].…”
Section: Recent Advantages In Anti-hla Antibody Detection By Luminexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mérés transzplantáció előtti szé-rumból, Luminex SAB IgG-teszttel történt, a páciensek mindegyike negatív eredményt mutatott a CDC és ELI-SA screening tesztekben [36]. A fenti tanulmányok mellett más szerzők megfi gyelései is kétségbe vonják a kizá-rólag SAB-technikával detektálható HLA-alloantitestek klinikai jelentőségét, ezért feltételezhetően az ELISA és CDC screenin g tesztben negatív páciensek esetén az SAB-technológiával a transzplantációt megelőzően meghatározott antitestek klinikai jelentősége korlátozott, még ha ezek speciálisan a do nor ellen irányulnak is [37]. Ezért nem ajánlott azon antigének UAM-ként történő megjelölése, amelyeket csak az SAB-teszttel lehet kimutatni.…”
Section: A Luminex Sab-teszt Során Detektált Antitestek Jelentőségeunclassified
“…A Luminex SAB-teszt széles körűen elfogadott a DSA-k kimutatására, holott még mindig nem tisztázott azon antitestek klinikai jelentősége, amelyek csak a hiperszenzitív Luminex SAB-módszerrel mutathatók ki [37]. A tesztet ért kritikák annak technikai hiányosságaira hív-ják fel a fi gyelmet.…”
Section: Technikai Ajánlásokunclassified