Clinical performance and marginal adaptation of class II direct and semidirect composite restorations over 3.5 years in vivo

Spreafico, Roberto; Krejci, Ivo; Dietschi, Didier

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2004.11.009

Cited by 68 publications

(66 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…According to these studies, direct restorations and indirect inlays in posterior teeth provide satisfactory clinical performance, and comparisons among them indicate little or no differences. 2,9,18,51 Within the limits of the present study, indirect composite resin inlays showed a success rate of 97.5% and direct composite resins showed a success rate of 98.4% after five years, consistent with the results of the previous studies.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

“…1 For this reason, in addition to their largely improved biomechanical properties, direct composite resin restorations are now routinely used as a metal-free alternative to posterior restorations. 2 Another laudable advantage presented by this procedure is that it allows for the maximum preservation of tooth structure, which concurs with the modern concept of a conservative approach to restorative dentistry. 3 However, early experiences with the direct restorative treatment method indicated that there were more clinical challenges and higher failure rates in these types of restorations than in amalgam restorations.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 58%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Five-Year Clinical Evaluation of Direct Nanofilled and Indirect Composite Resin Restorations in Posterior Teeth

Çetin

Ünlü²,

Cobanoglu³

2013

Operative Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Under clinical conditions, posterior direct nanofilled composites and indirect composite inlay systems have the potential to present a high success rate and were clinically satisfactory at five years postplacement. Conclusions: Under controlled clinical conditions, indirect composite resin inlays and direct composite resin restorations exhibited an annual failure rate of 2.5% and 1.6%, respectively, after five years. Therefore, the investigated materials showed acceptable clinical performance, and no significant differences were found among them. SUMMARY

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 58%

A Five-Year Clinical Evaluation of Direct Nanofilled and Indirect Composite Resin Restorations in Posterior Teeth

Çetin

Ünlü²,

Cobanoglu³

2013

Operative Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…When restoring large tooth defects, indirect composite restorations are a preferred option because of several advantages. These advantages include better marginal adaptation and anatomic form, more resistance to wear, increased fracture resistance, and more control of polymerization shrinkage [26][27][28] . At this juncture then, it must be highlighted that cements are indispensable for luting these indirect restorations at the dental clinic.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Physical Properties and Surface Degradation of Self-adhesive Resin Cements

et al. 2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study sought to evaluate the pH value, film thickness, filler particle percentage, and morphological changes of selfadhesive resin luting cements. Products tested were G-Cem, Maxcem, Smart Cem, and RelyX™ Unicem. Cement pH was measured with pH test paper. Filler particle percentage was calculated after cement samples were incinerated at 750℃. To test film thickness, mixed cements were placed between two glass plates and compressed using a loading device. For morphological changes, specimen surfaces were observed by SEM after treatment with various media. There were significant differences among the cement pH values measured at 20 seconds after light curing, and at 90 seconds and 48 hours after mixing. Filler particle percentage was directly proportional to film thickness. Degradation of cement surfaces was also detected after surface polishing and immersion in water, acetic acid, and acetone. In conclusion, significant differences were found in the surface properties of the materials tested, and these differences might lead to differences in their clinical performance.

show abstract

“…No entanto, uma outra alternativa clínica tem sido o uso de restaurações indiretas em resina composta 7,8 . Esta opção oferece também adequado desempenho mecânico e redução no encolhimento de polimerização em relação as restaurações de resina direta 9 .…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Técnicas alternativas de restauração indireta em resina composta: relato de casos clínicos

Goyatá¹,

Siqueira²,

Novaes³

et al. 2018

Arch Health Invest

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumoAs restaurações diretas em resina composta são amplamente utilizadas pelos cirurgiões dentistas. As várias técnicas descritas na literatura enfatizam e ratificam a natureza conservadora e minimamente invasiva. Porém, quando há grande destruição coronária, envolvendo mais de dois terços da distância intercuspídea, ou até mesmo o comprometimento de uma ou mais cúspides, a melhor alternativa é realizar o procedimento restaurador de forma indireta (com restaurações do tipo inlay ou onlay). Estas restaurações podem ser confeccionadas, em laboratório, com materiais de metal, cerâmica ou resina. Este trabalho tem por objetivo relatar três casos clínicos que utilizaram a resina composta de forma indireta e termopolimerização adicional em autoclave. Para todos os casos foram realizados preenchimento morfológico da cavidade com resina composta microhíbrida, e preparo para onlay com pontas diamantadas em alta rotação. Para os três casos clínicos os moldes dos preparos dentais foram obtidos com elastômeros. Em dois casos os modelos foram obtidos com silicone polimerizado por adição monofásico de consistência regular. O terceiro caso o modelo foi obtido com gesso pedra tipo IV. As restaurações foram elaboradoras pela técnica incremental com resina composta microhíbrida sobre os modelos e finalizadas com termopolimerização adicional em autoclave por 20 minutos. A cimentação preconizada foi adesiva realizada com cimento resinoso autoadesivo sob isolamento absoluto e após isso ajuste oclusal. A finalização seguiu-se com acabamento e polimento. As técnicas restauradoras descritas constituem-se alternativa clínica viável do ponto de vista funcional e estético, possibilitando aos profissionais da área oferecer tratamento eficaz e de baixo custo. Descritores: Resinas Compostas; Estética; Restauração Dentária Permanente; Polimerização. AbstractDirect composite resin resorations are extensively used by dental surgeons. The various techniques described in the literature emphasize and confirm the conservative and minimally invasive nature of these techniques. However, in the presence of extensive crown destruction involving more than two thirds of the intercuspal distance or even one or more cusps, the best alternative is to perform the procedure indirectly using inlay or onlay restorations. These restorations can be made in the laboratory with metal, ceramic or resin materials. The objective of the present paper is to report three clinical cases in which composite resin was used in an indirect manner with additional autoclave heath polymerization. Morphological filling of the cavity with microhybrid composite resin and preparation for onlay with high rotation diamond tips was performed in all three cases. The dental preparation models were botained with elastomers in all three cases. In two cases, the models were obtained with silicone polymerized by monophasic addition of regular consistency. In the third case, the model was obtained with type IV gypsum stone. The restorations were elaborated by the incremental technique with m...

show abstract

Clinical performance and marginal adaptation of class II direct and semidirect composite restorations over 3.5 years in vivo

Cited by 68 publications

References 22 publications

A Five-Year Clinical Evaluation of Direct Nanofilled and Indirect Composite Resin Restorations in Posterior Teeth

A Five-Year Clinical Evaluation of Direct Nanofilled and Indirect Composite Resin Restorations in Posterior Teeth

Evaluation of Physical Properties and Surface Degradation of Self-adhesive Resin Cements

Técnicas alternativas de restauração indireta em resina composta: relato de casos clínicos

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About