Clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with everolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents (EXAMINATION): 5-year results of a randomised trial
Abstract:SummaryBackground Data for the safety and effi cacy of new-generation drug-eluting stents at long-term follow-up, and specifi cally in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, are scarce. In the EXAMINATION trial, we compared everolimus-eluting stents (EES) with bare-metal stents (BMS) in an all-comer population with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. In this study, we assessed the 5-year outcomes of the population in the EXAMINATION trial.
“…In this study EES also significantly reduced the rates of target-lesion revascularization (7). Moreover, the 5-year results of this randomized trial (8) confirmed that the sustained clinical efficacy of EES in STEMI patients may translate into a survival improvement.…”
Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) represent a disruptive technology that has caused a new revolution in interventional cardiology. BVS appear to be particularly appealing in patients presenting with an acute myocardial infarction (MI). The available evidence on the value of BVS implantation in this challenging scenario is very promising but still limited. Results come from preliminary small observational studies, prospective registries that include a control group, and from scarce randomized clinical trials with surrogate mechanistic or angiographic primary end-points. Further studies, powered for clinical endpoints, are required to establish the relative safety and efficacy of BVS vs. new-generation metallic drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with ST-segment elevation acute MI.
“…In this study EES also significantly reduced the rates of target-lesion revascularization (7). Moreover, the 5-year results of this randomized trial (8) confirmed that the sustained clinical efficacy of EES in STEMI patients may translate into a survival improvement.…”
Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) represent a disruptive technology that has caused a new revolution in interventional cardiology. BVS appear to be particularly appealing in patients presenting with an acute myocardial infarction (MI). The available evidence on the value of BVS implantation in this challenging scenario is very promising but still limited. Results come from preliminary small observational studies, prospective registries that include a control group, and from scarce randomized clinical trials with surrogate mechanistic or angiographic primary end-points. Further studies, powered for clinical endpoints, are required to establish the relative safety and efficacy of BVS vs. new-generation metallic drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with ST-segment elevation acute MI.
“…In patients with STEMI, DES (in particular new-generation DES) have demonstrated better efficacy as compared with BMS and should be used as the default strategy in STEMI patients, even when DAPT cannot be sustained beyond 1 month. 177,178,[216][217][218] (see section 16.1.2). As discussed in section 16.4, radial access is preferred over femoral access.…”
“…In addition, increasing age was associated with BMS use in the present trial which is also seen elsewhere in the literature. The age-dependent selection of stent type is probably reasoned by the results of the COMFORTABLE AMI and EXAMINATION trial which did not show superiority of DES over BMS in patients>65 years19 and >75 years,3 respectively. Single vessel disease predicting BMS use in the present analysis is probably explainable by the higher risk for restenosis with BMS 3 19.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mainly based on the long-term data of the Comparison of Biolimus Eluted From an Erodible Stent Coating With Bare Metal Stents in Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (COMFORTABLE AMI)2 and Everolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (EXAMINATION) trials,3 current European guidelines recommend the use of drug-eluting stents (DES) over bare-metal stents (BMS) in AMI regardless of presentation with ST-elevation or non-ST-elevation infarction 4. In contrast, current US guidelines do not recommend a preference for DES in AMI 5 6…”
Despite the frequent use of DES nowadays, a substantial number of patients were treated by BMS in AMI complicated by CS. After adjustment for risk factors, the 1-year outcome of patients treated by DES compared with BMS was similar. TRIAL REGISTRATIONNUMBER: www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00491036.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.