2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical observations of biofouling on PEO coated silicone hydrogel contact lenses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
74
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…29,30 Strategies that have been designed to prevent microbial colonization of contact lenses include incorporation of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), 31,32 phosphorylcholine, 33 fimbrolides, 34 silver, 35 selenium, 36 antimicrobial cationic peptides (AMP), 37,38 or high density poly (ethylene oxide) dialdehyde (PEO(ALD) 2 ). 39 However, disadvantages of these technologies are that NSAIDs and silver need to be released from lenses to retain activity, and so might lose activity during use; PEO(ALD) 2 and phosphorylcholine coatings are passive anti-adhesive agents (i.e., do not contain inherent antimicrobial activity). In addition, most strategies have not been tested against Acanthamoeba, fungal isolates, or drug resistant bacteria.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,30 Strategies that have been designed to prevent microbial colonization of contact lenses include incorporation of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), 31,32 phosphorylcholine, 33 fimbrolides, 34 silver, 35 selenium, 36 antimicrobial cationic peptides (AMP), 37,38 or high density poly (ethylene oxide) dialdehyde (PEO(ALD) 2 ). 39 However, disadvantages of these technologies are that NSAIDs and silver need to be released from lenses to retain activity, and so might lose activity during use; PEO(ALD) 2 and phosphorylcholine coatings are passive anti-adhesive agents (i.e., do not contain inherent antimicrobial activity). In addition, most strategies have not been tested against Acanthamoeba, fungal isolates, or drug resistant bacteria.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several hydrogel coatings, for example, from PEG, 64 polyacrylamide, 16 and polylysine -PEG copolymers 14 have shown resistance to bacterial colonization. It must be noted, however, that in vivo fouling is more complex than what in vitro models can mimic at present, 63 and in vitro tests of protein and cell resistance may not directly translate to resistance to bacterial attachment in vivo . It is also of interest to note that there is a need for covalent attachment of nonfouling hydrogel polymers onto the biomaterial surface in order to achieve long -lasting resistance to bacterial settlement.…”
Section: Nonfouling Coatingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells can adhere, spread, and proliferate on the thermoresponsive surface coated with PNIPAAm at 37 °C, and can be spontaneously detached from the hydrophilic surfaces formed below the LCST without enzymatic digestion [37][38][39]. On the other hand, poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and its derivatives have a good antifouling effect to many kinds of molecules, proteins and even cells, enabling their wide applications in the biomedical field [42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. The PEG molecules also have a faster hydration rate than the PNIPAAm, and therefore tethering the PEG molecules will speed up the release of cells cultured on the PNIPAAm surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%