2006
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72515-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Mastitis in Norwegian Herds After a Combined Selective Dry-Cow Therapy and Teat-Dipping Trial

Abstract: The objective of this study was to see if introduction of a 2-yr combined selective dry-cow therapy and teat-dipping trial would reduce clinical mastitis (CM) events in 164 Norwegian dairy herds. Three different penicillin or penicillin/dihydrostreptomycin-based dry-cow treatments, and 3 different teat-dipping regimens (negative control, iodine teat dip, or an external teat sealant) were independently and randomly allocated to each herd. Complete lactations both before and during the trial were investigated. A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In all housing systems, high stocking density, dirty bedding or ground, infected utensils, poor ventilation and high humidity were important risk factors (Sudhan and Sharma, 2010).While looking on the animal associated determinants it has been found that increasing parity increased the risk of mastitis in buffaloes. Other reports were similar with the current findings (Kumar and Sharma, 2002;Sharma and Prasad 2002;Whist et al, 2006;Kavitha et al, 2009).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In all housing systems, high stocking density, dirty bedding or ground, infected utensils, poor ventilation and high humidity were important risk factors (Sudhan and Sharma, 2010).While looking on the animal associated determinants it has been found that increasing parity increased the risk of mastitis in buffaloes. Other reports were similar with the current findings (Kumar and Sharma, 2002;Sharma and Prasad 2002;Whist et al, 2006;Kavitha et al, 2009).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Postmilking teat dipping, practiced for both herds, did not appear to prevent the growth of S. aureus on the teats. The efficacy of the teat dips may not be as good under field conditions as under experimental conditions, as recently shown in a Norwegian field study (49). In herd II, extramammary sites may be more likely routes of transmission than milk from infected quarters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…More surprisingly, in herd B, two genotypes [13,17] present in the nasal cavities of the sampler, external to the farm, were also present in the quarter milk sample, one of which was also found on the teat skin. In the latter case, the sampler was most likely the origin of the contamination of the samples.…”
Section: Isolates Of Human Originmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is always difficult when evaluating the effectiveness of the teat dipping to determine what is attributable to the practice or to the products or to the manner in which the teat dipping is applied. It has been reported that the conventional cleaning of udders with wipes was very effective in eliminating S. aureus present on the teats as opposed to pre-teat dipping [16] and that post-teat dipping also had limited effectiveness [17]. The only herd not practicing pre-dipping of teats (herd D) had the lowest rate of cows infected with S. aureus.…”
Section: Teat Skin Isolatesmentioning
confidence: 99%