Clinical intuition versus statistics: different modes of tacit knowledge in clinical epidemiology and evidence-based medicine

Abstract

Despite its phenomenal success since its inception in the early nineteen-nineties, the evidence-based medicine movement has not succeeded in shaking off an epistemological critique derived from the experiential or tacit dimensions of clinical reasoning about particular individuals. This critique claims that the evidence-based medicine model does not take account of tacit knowing as developed by the philosopher Michael Polanyi. However, the epistemology of evidence-based medicine is premised on the elimination of the tacit dimension from clinical judgment. This is demonstrated through analyzing the dichotomy between clinical and statistical intuition in evidence-based medicine's epistemology of clinical reasoning. I argue that clinical epidemiology presents a more nuanced epistemological model for the application of statistical epidemiology to the clinical context. Polanyi's theory of tacit knowing is compatible with the model of clinical reasoning associated with clinical epidemiology, but not evidence-based medicine.

Exploring varieties of knowledge in safe work practices - an ethnographic study of surgical teams

“…The EBM-perspective's dominance in medicine has resulted in a strong focus on the creation, storage and distribution of codified/explicit 'text-book' knowledge [13], expressed as procedures, protocols, routines, etc. However, many researchers believe that one must also account for other kinds of knowledge health care personnel use in practice, such as clinical judgment and expertise [14-19]. Greenhalgh et al [20] support this view, stating that: "...multidisciplinary teams balance encoded knowledge, in the form of standardised outcome measurement, with tacit knowledge, in the form of intuitive judgement, clinical experience and expertise, in the process of clinical decision making" (p. 183).…”

Outcomes of Antiretroviral Therapy in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study: Latent Class Analysis

“…Rather than analyzing the independent contribution of individual socio-behavioral variables, for example the mode of HIV transmission, we identified groups of patients that are similar with respect to many socio-behavioral characteristics. Our approach is therefore more closely related to clinical intuition and experiential clinical reasoning than the usual analysis of individual risk factors [32]. Previous analyses of the Swiss HIV cohort showed that virologic response to ART was poorer in migrants from sub-Saharan Africa [33] and in patients infected through IDU [2].…”

Clinical Uncertainty in Primary Care

“…But it should be clear from this brief account that this approach to clinical method rests on a number of assumptions (Henry 2010 ;Braude 2009 ;Djubegovic et al 2009 ;Mol 2008 ). First, it assumes that diseases and risk categories exist and are useful entities -that is, that it is both possible and helpful to sort patients into those who do or do not fulfi l the diagnostic criteria for a disease or pre-disease state (breast cancer, peptic ulcer, high cardiovascular risk, 'problem drinking' and so on).…”