2017
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical information has low sensitivity for postmortem diagnosis of heart valve disease

Abstract: Clinical information recorded premortem is highly specific but relatively insensitive for the cause of death established at autopsy. Population-based mortality statistics that depend on premortem clinical information are likely to routinely underestimate the mortality burden of VHD.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most commonnly occuring valve lesions are mitral regurgitation (MR), aortic stenosis (AS) and aortic regurgitation (AR) 3,4 . However, the true prevalance is higher than the clinical data as revealed by post-mortem studies 5 . Moreover, multivalvular heart lesions are highly prevalent [6][7][8] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The most commonnly occuring valve lesions are mitral regurgitation (MR), aortic stenosis (AS) and aortic regurgitation (AR) 3,4 . However, the true prevalance is higher than the clinical data as revealed by post-mortem studies 5 . Moreover, multivalvular heart lesions are highly prevalent [6][7][8] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Second, we used the underlying cause of death in the national death certificate as the outcome. Therefore, the mortality rate in the present study might be underestimated because clinical documentation of valvar heart disease was generally highly specific but relatively insensitive as a cause of death, compared with postmortem autopsy identification of valvar heart disease 27) . Finally, despite our efforts to adjust for potential confounding factors, we cannot rule out the effects of unmeasured factors AR 15) , and the progression of aortic valve calcification 16) .…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Moreover, they heavily rely on routinely collected data (including ICD-10 codes). This epidemiological approach can be unreliable, as post-mortem analyses have revealed the true prevalence of VHD to be significantly greater than that clinically coded and reported [ 3 ]. Indeed, population-based data tend to be collected only when VHD is at least moderate or clinically relevant, with patients referred to a diagnostic test because of symptom complaints or the presence of some clinical indications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%