2007
DOI: 10.1586/1744666x.3.5.721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical implication of autoantibodies in patients with systemic rheumatic diseases

Abstract: Autoantibodies have been used extensively as a useful biomarker in systemic lupus erythematosus and other autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Antinuclear antibodies by immunofluorescence are a standard clinical test to screen for evidence of systemic autoimmunity. Different specific autoantibodies are associated with particular diagnoses, symptoms, unique syndromes, subsets of the disease and clinical activity. They are produced prior to the onset of clinical manifestations and have predictive value. This review fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
84
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
2
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table 4, the number of sera scored in our laboratory as definitely ANA positive by IFA during the year 2011, represented only 2.3% of the total examined, while up to 7.4% (3.2 times more) of samples were positive by IB only (these sera were positive at 1:10 dilution when tested by IFA, but were negative at the 1:100 dilution). This finding does not contradict to the statement that IFA is the best approach for ANA screening (Satoh et al, 2007 (Bradwell et al, 1995;Verstegen et al, 2009). According to our experience, this relationship is true at least with a probability of 55%.…”
Section: Remarks To Ana Diagnosticsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…As shown in Table 4, the number of sera scored in our laboratory as definitely ANA positive by IFA during the year 2011, represented only 2.3% of the total examined, while up to 7.4% (3.2 times more) of samples were positive by IB only (these sera were positive at 1:10 dilution when tested by IFA, but were negative at the 1:100 dilution). This finding does not contradict to the statement that IFA is the best approach for ANA screening (Satoh et al, 2007 (Bradwell et al, 1995;Verstegen et al, 2009). According to our experience, this relationship is true at least with a probability of 55%.…”
Section: Remarks To Ana Diagnosticsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…A marker of human systemic lupus erythamosus is the presence of high-titer IgG autoantibodies against nuclear autoantigens, especially dsDNA (35,36). Similarly, aged Fas lpr or B-cell-specific fas-deficient mice produce excessive amounts of autoantibodies directed against dsDNA or ssDNA autoantigens (5, 32).…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…IIF allows the detection of a large number of nuclear and cytoplasm antigens, however, the IIF assay has some downsides. It is laborious and time consuming due to the large number of serial dilutions and visual determination of the staining patterns [7]. The assay is subjective as it relies heavily on human interpretation [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%