2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00851-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical impact of second harmonic imaging and left heart contrast in echocardiographic stress testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since advanced disease is more likely to result in adverse outcomes, it should not be surprising that inducible WT abnormality turned out to be an important predictor of events in our study27. It is also important to realize that WT abnormalities are much better assessed on contrast echocardiography2830, which might also explain the results seen in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Since advanced disease is more likely to result in adverse outcomes, it should not be surprising that inducible WT abnormality turned out to be an important predictor of events in our study27. It is also important to realize that WT abnormalities are much better assessed on contrast echocardiography2830, which might also explain the results seen in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The recent development of harmonic imaging 29 has overcome the problem and we used it in our study, which be another reason why low-dose DSE had a better diagnostic value for MV in our study than in the previous studies. 22,23 Finally, the number of study patients was not enough to ascertain any discrepancy between dual SPECT and DSE, so it is not conclusive that positive idntification of MV by dual SPECT without functional recovery indicates residual stenosis of the infarct-related artery.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The diagnostic accuracy of second harmonic imaging with contrast agent during stress echocardiography has been reported as modest (70-80%) in previous studies. 21,22 Although oronary angiography has well-known limitations when used to diagnose the severity of coronary artery disease, further comparative study between contrast-enhanced second harmonic imaging and CK is needed to determine its diagnostic accuracy for detecting coronary artery disease.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%