2016
DOI: 10.1159/000447561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Impact of <sup>123</sup>I-Ioflupane SPECT (DaTscan) in a Movement Disorder Center

Abstract: Background/Aims: The clinical diagnosis of degenerative forms of parkinsonism is imperfect, with past studies reporting a high rate of misdiagnosis by neurologists and movement disorder specialists, particularly early in the disease course. 123I-ioflupane SPECT (DaTscan) is a diagnostic neuroimaging tool used to distinguish essential tremor from tremor due to degenerative parkinsonisms. The present study expands upon prior studies of the clinical impact of DaTscan imaging in movement disorder center… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our experience is the largest series reported to date of the use of DaTscan imaging in routine clinical practice. Our results are consistent with prior, smaller, single center reports [8][9][10][11][12][13] that highlight common clinical scenarios where identification of NSDD can help to clarify clinical diagnosis and treatment decisions [6]. In general, an abnormal DaTscan predicted a treatment change when NSDD was uncertain, and a normal DaTscan predicted a change in diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our experience is the largest series reported to date of the use of DaTscan imaging in routine clinical practice. Our results are consistent with prior, smaller, single center reports [8][9][10][11][12][13] that highlight common clinical scenarios where identification of NSDD can help to clarify clinical diagnosis and treatment decisions [6]. In general, an abnormal DaTscan predicted a treatment change when NSDD was uncertain, and a normal DaTscan predicted a change in diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…ET (18), PD vs. DIP (18), PD vs. VP (12), PD vs. normal variant (11), Multifactorial gait D/o (7), Patient requested (4), uncertain PD (3), Unusual tremor (2), Known Dx of MS (2), Myelopathic signs (2), Dystonic features (1), Myoclonus (1), Psychogenic (1), Young-onset with atypical features (1) Bhattacharjee et al 10 256 UK Retrospective, single-arm 71.65 ± 16.02 53% NR modified H&Y/UK PD Brain Bank Visual and semi-quantitative 4.35 PD (190), VP (5), ET (18), DIP (8), Other (8) LBD (22), Diagnosis Uncertain (5) Crotty et al 11 261 Ireland Retrospective, single-arm 65.6 ± 12.22 57% NR NR NR NR PS (163), LBD (7), DIP (45), PD vs. ET (12), PD vs. dementia (2), PS vs. PD (19), PD progression (2), PD vs. VP (8), PD vs. dystonia (2), unclear (1) Garcia Vicente et al 12 42 Spain Retrospective, single-arm 78.7 (50–88) 38% 12 NR Visual and semi-quantitative NR PD (19), VP (14), ET (5), DIP (2), Other (2) Graebner et al 13 27 USA Prospective, single-arm 61.2 ± 13.4 52% 1 NR NR 4.1 DP vs. ET (5), DP vs. VP (4), DP vs. DIP (4), DP vs. psychogenic or malingering (3), DP vs. others (6), Patient request (4) Hesse et al 14 278 Germany Retrospective, single-arm 63 ± 12 59% 18 UK PD Brain Bank/MDS-PD/PSP criteria NR 4.25 PD (129), MSA (10), PSP (8), VP (15), SWEDD (116) Jennings et al 15 35 USA Retrospective, single-arm 66.8 (46.2–81.7) 63% 6 NR Quantitative 2.4 ...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary endpoints were the pooled analysis of the proportions of patients who had a change in management and in diagnosis following imaging with DaTscan. Change in management was reported by 13 studies 6 , 7 , 9 12 , 18 , 20 , 21 , 23 25 including 950 patients. Using a random-effects model 54% (95% CI: 47–61%) of patients had a change in management following the scan (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differential diagnosis between PD and ET is clinical. When the diagnosis is doubtful, a SPECT-DAT scan can be performed, which consists in evaluating the striatal uptake of 123I-2b-carbomethoxy-3b-(4-iodophenyl)- N -(3-fluoropropyl)-nortropane using a SPECT (Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography), a test that is extremely expensive, and therefore not easily accessible in habitual clinical practice [ 3 ]. In spite of the usefulness of these biomarkers, the expenses and requirements of the needed technology make it unfeasible to use these tests with every patient that has motor conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%