Objective: To determine whether providing remote neurologic care into the homes of people with Parkinson disease (PD) is feasible, beneficial, and valuable.Methods: In a 1-year randomized controlled trial, we compared usual care to usual care supplemented by 4 virtual visits via video conferencing from a remote specialist into patients' homes. Primary outcome measures were feasibility, as measured by the proportion who completed at least one virtual visit and the proportion of virtual visits completed on time; and efficacy, as measured by the change in the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39, a quality of life scale. Secondary outcomes included quality of care, caregiver burden, and time and travel savings.Results: A total of 927 individuals indicated interest, 210 were enrolled, and 195 were randomized.Participants had recently seen a specialist (73%) and were largely college-educated (73%) and white (96%). Ninety-five (98% of the intervention group) completed at least one virtual visit, and 91% of 388 virtual visits were completed. Quality of life did not improve in those receiving virtual house calls (0.3 points worse on a 100-point scale; 95% confidence interval [CI] 22.0 to 2.7 points; p 5 0.78) nor did quality of care or caregiver burden. Each virtual house call saved patients a median of 88 minutes (95% CI 70-120; p , 0.0001) and 38 miles per visit (95% CI 36-56; p , 0.0001).Conclusions: Providing remote neurologic care directly into the homes of people with PD was feasible and was neither more nor less efficacious than usual in-person care. Virtual house calls generated great interest and provided substantial convenience.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02038959.

In neurosurgical literature, findings such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode positions are conventionally reported in relation to the anterior and posterior commissures of the individual patient (AC/PC coordinates). However, the neuroimaging literature including neuroanatomical atlases, activation patterns, and brain connectivity maps has converged on a different population-based standard (MNI coordinates). Ideally, one could relate these two literatures by directly transforming MRIs from neurosurgical patients into MNI space. However obtaining these patient MRIs can prove difficult or impossible, especially for older studies or those with hundreds of patients. Here, we introduce a methodology for mapping an AC/PC coordinate (such as a DBS electrode position) to MNI space without the need for MRI scans from the patients themselves. We validate our approach using a cohort of DBS patients in which MRIs are available, and test whether several variations on our approach provide added benefit. We then use our approach to convert previously reported DBS electrode coordinates from eight different neurological and psychiatric diseases into MNI space. Finally, we demonstrate the value of such a conversion using the DBS target for essential tremor as an example, relating the site of the active DBS contact to different MNI atlases as well as anatomical and functional connectomes in MNI space.

Perfusion-weighted imaging measures of ischemia severity accurately differentiate irreversibly injured core from penumbral, salvageable tissue. The best threshold for identifying core infarcted tissue is adjusted Tmax of > or =6 to 8 seconds.