1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0099-2399(06)81109-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of EDTA solution as an endodontic irrigant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
32
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to its cleaning ability, EDTA may detach biofilms adhering to root canal walls (17). This may explain why an EDTA irrigant proved to be highly superior to saline in reducing intracanal microbiotica (19), despite the fact that its antiseptic capacity is relatively limited (17,34). The antibacterial activity of NaOCl has been proved in previous studies.…”
Section: Elimination Of Microorganismsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition to its cleaning ability, EDTA may detach biofilms adhering to root canal walls (17). This may explain why an EDTA irrigant proved to be highly superior to saline in reducing intracanal microbiotica (19), despite the fact that its antiseptic capacity is relatively limited (17,34). The antibacterial activity of NaOCl has been proved in previous studies.…”
Section: Elimination Of Microorganismsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition to their cleaning ability, chelators may detach biofilms adhering to root canal walls (Kishor Gulabivala, personal communication). This may explain why an EDTA irrigant proved to be highly superior to saline in reducing intracanal microbiota (133), despite the fact that its antiseptic capacity is relatively limited (134). Albeit never shown in a randomized clinical trial, an alternating irrigating regimen of NaOCl and EDTA may be more efficient in reducing bacterial loads in root canal systems than NaOCl alone (100).…”
Section: Chelator Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was previously demonstrated that bacteria can regrow in empty canals. Thirty-six of 150 canals (24%) (49) and four of 12 canals (33%) (31) showed a negative culture at the first visit but were positive at the second visit 7 days later when canals were left empty. On the contrary, bacteria also appear to die off in empty canals.…”
Section: Performance Of Microbiological Root Canal Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%