2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2006.00033.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Evaluation of Direct Cuspal Coverage with Posterior Composite Resin Restorations

Abstract: Microhybrid composite resin demonstrated excellent clinical performance in direct cuspal coverage at completion of a 30-month evaluation. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE In selected clinical situations, cuspal coverage direct posterior composite restorations may represent a valid alternative to conventional indirect restorations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
43
2
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
43
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a 30-month clinical study, direct microhybrid resin composite restorations with one or two missing cusps were assessed. 15 All the restorations were retained and showed high "Alpha" scores and corroborate the findings of the current study. Additional reports and reviews support this good clinical performance of larger composite restorations, and they showed no significant difference between direct and indirect resin composite restorations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a 30-month clinical study, direct microhybrid resin composite restorations with one or two missing cusps were assessed. 15 All the restorations were retained and showed high "Alpha" scores and corroborate the findings of the current study. Additional reports and reviews support this good clinical performance of larger composite restorations, and they showed no significant difference between direct and indirect resin composite restorations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This is in accordance with findings of previous studies. 15 Tooth sensitivity can often be found after marginal gap formation, which may lead to microleakage and caries formation. One explanation is the good C-factor in the restorations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the application of indirect composite restorations with cuspal coverage on posterior teeth has been reported to be very successful, with an 'excellent level of clinical performance' over an evaluation period of 30 months 24 among teeth not necessarily displaying signs of tooth wear, the results of a study by Bartlett and Sundaram 13 have provided less promising levels of clinical performance, where indirect cusp coverage (micro-filled) composite resin restorations were used to treat cases of posterior tooth wear among patients with tooth wear. A failure rate of 21% over an evaluation period of three years was described by the latter group; fracture and complete loss were the most common modes of failure.…”
Section: Indirect Composite Resin Restorationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors recommend cusp coverage to restore weak posterior teeth 9) . Actually, some clinical trials achieved promising results with this method for the restoration of severally destroyed posterior teeth 10,11) . However, little data are available about the effect of composite coverage on the fracture resistance of premolar teeth when the palatal cusps are defective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%