2021
DOI: 10.4103/jism.jism_27_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical evaluation of Chyawanprash as a preventive measure during the COVID-19 pandemic: An open-label, multicentric, randomized, comparative, prospective, and interventional community-based clinical study on healthy individuals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19,20 The beneficial effect of AYUSH prophylactics in the prevention of COVID-19 has been examined through epidemiological studies in the general population and high-risk groups over time. [21][22][23][24][25][26][27] No studies so far, however, have tried to correlate AYUSH prophylactic intake and post-infection disease prognosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,20 The beneficial effect of AYUSH prophylactics in the prevention of COVID-19 has been examined through epidemiological studies in the general population and high-risk groups over time. [21][22][23][24][25][26][27] No studies so far, however, have tried to correlate AYUSH prophylactic intake and post-infection disease prognosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mixture contains several bioactive herbs (with the major ingredient, amla or Indian gooseberry) with broad-spectrum therapeutic potential, including bioactive antioxidants, anti-inflammatory, adaptogenic, cytoprotective, and rejuvenating properties [23]. The efficacy and safety of CP as an immunomodulator have been demonstrated in preclinical trials [25], and its effectiveness in reducing health care resource utilization (HCRU) (ICU use, hospitalization days) and improving quality of life (QoL) (WHO ordinal scale) as an immunomodulator has been demonstrated in high-quality clinical trials [26][27][28]. However, these interventions and their outcomes presented over different settings and durations have shown mixed results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%