Clinical differences of hand and rotary instrumentations during biomechanical preparation in primary teeth—A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Patnana, Arun Kumar; Chugh, Ankita; Kumar, Pravin; Wadhwa, Puneet; Singh, Surjit

doi:10.1111/ipd.12720

Cited by 16 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In total, 33 systematic reviews [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ] were included in the present umbrella review ( Table 1 ). All SRs covered a defined timeframe; however, one did not mention such information [ 33 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…All SRs covered a defined timeframe; however, one did not mention such information [ 33 ]. Three systematics reviews failed to report a language restriction [ 2 , 10 , 11 ], seventeen restricted their search to studies in English [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ], one restricted to English and Persia [ 26 ], and the remaining had no language restrictions [ 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 9 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Regarding the methodological quality of SRs, three studies were assessed as of critically low quality [ 12 , 27 ], nine as of low quality [ 2 , 6 , 15 , 19 , 21 , 25 , 31 , 35 ], seventeen studies as of moderate quality [ 5 , 9 , 10 , 13 , 14 , 18 , 20 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 26 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 32 , 33 , 34 ], and six as of high quality [ 1 , 3 , 4 , 11 , 16 , 17 ] (detailed in Table 2 ). None of the included SR fully complied with the AMSTAR2 checklist.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Vital and Nonvital Pulp Therapy in Primary Dentition: An Umbrella Review

Lopes¹,

Calvão²,

Vieira³

et al. 2021

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dental caries is the most common non-communicable disease in children with significant aesthetic, functional, and quality of life deterioration. Depending on the depth, two approaches may be considered in primary dentition: vital pulp therapy (VPT) or non-vital therapy (NPT). This umbrella review aimed to critically assess the available systematic reviews (SRs) on VPT and NPT. An electronic database search was conducted (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, Web of Science, and LILACS) until June 2021. The Risk of Bias (RoB) of SRs was analyzed using the Measurement Tool to Assess SRs criteria 2 (AMSTAR2). From 272 entries, 33 SRs were included. Regarding the methodological quality, three studies were critically low, nine low, seventeen moderate, and six were rated as high quality. The quality of evidence produced by the available SRs was moderate. Future high standard SRs and well-designed clinical trials are warranted to better elucidate the clinical protocols and outcomes of VPT and NPT.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Vital and Nonvital Pulp Therapy in Primary Dentition: An Umbrella Review

Lopes¹,

Calvão²,

Vieira³

et al. 2021

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Desse modo, são fatores que devem ser levados em consideração durante o tratamento endodôntico. (Ahmed et al, 2013;Chugh et al, 2021;Natchiyar et al, 2021).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

“…Pensando nisso, outros sistemas de limas foram desenvolvidos ao longo do tempo, com o objetivo de melhorar o processo clínico das pulpectomias. (Chugh et al, 2021;George et al, 2016;Manchanda et al, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Uso de sistemas rotatórios no tratamento endodôntico em odontopediatria

Lins¹,

Filho²,

Costa³

2021

RSD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Esta revisão de literatura objetivou avaliar o uso dos sistemas de limas rotatórias em comparação com os sistemas padrões de limas manuais, levando em consideração o tempo e a qualidade do preparo de canais radiculares em dentes decíduos, bem como o efeito do tratamento com essas limas na cooperação e no desenvolvimento de dor pós-operatória nas crianças. O levantamento bibliográfico foi baseado em artigos publicados nos últimos 5 anos, encontrados nas seguintes bases de dados da área da saúde: PubMed/Medline, Scopus, LILACS, SciELO e Cocrhane. Os resultados demonstraram que tratamentos endodônticos com limas rotatórias exibiram menor tempo e melhor qualidade do preparo biomecânimo dos canais em dentes decíduos, bem como resultaram em menor experiência de dor pósóperatória, quando comparado ao uso de limas manuais. Com base nisso, é possível concluir que pulpectomias realizadas com limas rotatórias são eficazes, seguras e diminuem o tempo de tratamento e a dor pós-operatória no tratamento endodôntico pediátrico.

show abstract

Shaping ability of novel nickel‐titanium systems in printed primary molars

Topal

Falakaloğlu

Silva

et al. 2022

Int J Paed Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Manual or mechanized instruments can be used for root canal preparation. Manual instrumentation using K-files is widely used in primary teeth, but there are many limitations. Mechanized root canal preparation can lead to easy access to all canals, decrease instrumentation time, and result in more funnel-shaped root canals, resulting in a more predictable uniform paste fill.Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the shaping ability and instrumentation time of VDW.ROTATE™ and EdgeTaper Platinum™ during the preparation of resinprinted primary molars. Hand K-files were used as a reference for comparison.Design: Sixty-six resin-based maxillary second primary molars, obtained from extracted tooth cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image and printed on a three-dimensional printer, were divided into three groups: VDW.ROTATE™, EdgeTaper Platinum™, and K-files. The specimens were scanned using CBCT imaging before and after root canal preparation. Images were registered using a dedicated software, and changes (Δ) in the canal area, volume, and untouched canal surface were calculated. Instrumentation time was evaluated. Data were statistically analyzed using the SPSS program.Results: There was no significant difference among the tested file systems for Δ canal volume and area (p > .05). VDW.ROTATE™, however, showed significantly lower untouched canal surface area than other systems in all roots (p < .001).The VDW.ROTATE™ was found to be significantly faster (6.47 ± 0.39 min) than EdgeTaper Platinum™ (7.71 ± 0.73 min) and K-files (8.22 ± 0.72 min), (p < .05). Conclusions:The shaping ability and the instrumentation time were directly influenced by the root canal instrumentation system used during the preparation of resin-printed primary molars, with VDW.ROTATE™ being the faster system and associated with the lower amount of untouched canal surface area.

show abstract

Clinical differences of hand and rotary instrumentations during biomechanical preparation in primary teeth—A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Cited by 16 publications

References 22 publications

Vital and Nonvital Pulp Therapy in Primary Dentition: An Umbrella Review

Vital and Nonvital Pulp Therapy in Primary Dentition: An Umbrella Review

Uso de sistemas rotatórios no tratamento endodôntico em odontopediatria

Shaping ability of novel nickel‐titanium systems in printed primary molars

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About