Abstract:Objectives:
To compare the effects of diode and erbium, chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) lasers in second-stage implant surgery applications.
Methods:
This is a cross-sectional study that was carried out on patients who received implant treatment at the Departments of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Periodontology, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey between January 2017 and January 2018. Implants of the patients in the first group (n=20) we… Show more
“…In the study done by Tunc et al ., using the diode and Er, Cr:YSGG laser systems for implant recovery, the VAS was noticed to be increased as the time taken for the procedure was increased. [ 19 ] In the current study, the VAS scale was higher in the conventional group than the two laser groups ( P = 0.000), however the VAS score between the two laser groups did not show any statistically significant difference.…”
Aim:
The aim is to compare the clinical efficacy of diode laser and erbium, chromium-doped yttrium, scandium, gallium, and garnet (Er, Cr:YSGG) laser for implant stage 2 recovery procedure.
Materials and Methods:
A total of 30 patients who had undergone dental implant placement were included in this study. The subjects were randomly allocated into three groups. Group 1 patients (
n
= 10) had implant recovery using diode laser, Group 2 (
n
= 10) implant recovery with Er, Cr:YSGG and conventional scalpel method (
n
= 10) was the third group. The pain assessment was recorded using visual analog scale (VAS scale), time taken for the procedure, intra-operative bleeding, time taken for healing were recorded for the three groups.
Results:
Data were tabulated and the results were analyzed using SPSS software version 26. Mann–Whitney U-test was used to compare the postoperative analgesic used, postoperative VAS score, the time taken for recovery and time taken for healing between the three study groups. Results were considered to be statistically significant when
P
< 0.05. Operation duration under Er, Cr:YSGG were much faster than the diode laser, however the results were not statistically significant (
P
= 0.051). The operation time under Er, Ch: YSGG and laser were faster than the conventional scalpel group (
P
= 0.000). The time taken for healing was faster in the Er, Cr:YSGG laser group than the diode laser and the scalpel group (
P
= 0.000). VAS scale at day 0 was higher in the conventional group than the two laser groups (
P
= 0.000).
Conclusion:
Considering the advantages of both these laser systems such as less anesthesia, less surgical trauma and faster healing, and post-operative comfort, lasers are an effective tool for implant stage two recovery techniques. However, since diode lasers are more cost effective when compared to Er, Cr:YSGG, diode lasers may meet the clinical needs when compared to hard-tissue lasers.
“…In the study done by Tunc et al ., using the diode and Er, Cr:YSGG laser systems for implant recovery, the VAS was noticed to be increased as the time taken for the procedure was increased. [ 19 ] In the current study, the VAS scale was higher in the conventional group than the two laser groups ( P = 0.000), however the VAS score between the two laser groups did not show any statistically significant difference.…”
Aim:
The aim is to compare the clinical efficacy of diode laser and erbium, chromium-doped yttrium, scandium, gallium, and garnet (Er, Cr:YSGG) laser for implant stage 2 recovery procedure.
Materials and Methods:
A total of 30 patients who had undergone dental implant placement were included in this study. The subjects were randomly allocated into three groups. Group 1 patients (
n
= 10) had implant recovery using diode laser, Group 2 (
n
= 10) implant recovery with Er, Cr:YSGG and conventional scalpel method (
n
= 10) was the third group. The pain assessment was recorded using visual analog scale (VAS scale), time taken for the procedure, intra-operative bleeding, time taken for healing were recorded for the three groups.
Results:
Data were tabulated and the results were analyzed using SPSS software version 26. Mann–Whitney U-test was used to compare the postoperative analgesic used, postoperative VAS score, the time taken for recovery and time taken for healing between the three study groups. Results were considered to be statistically significant when
P
< 0.05. Operation duration under Er, Cr:YSGG were much faster than the diode laser, however the results were not statistically significant (
P
= 0.051). The operation time under Er, Ch: YSGG and laser were faster than the conventional scalpel group (
P
= 0.000). The time taken for healing was faster in the Er, Cr:YSGG laser group than the diode laser and the scalpel group (
P
= 0.000). VAS scale at day 0 was higher in the conventional group than the two laser groups (
P
= 0.000).
Conclusion:
Considering the advantages of both these laser systems such as less anesthesia, less surgical trauma and faster healing, and post-operative comfort, lasers are an effective tool for implant stage two recovery techniques. However, since diode lasers are more cost effective when compared to Er, Cr:YSGG, diode lasers may meet the clinical needs when compared to hard-tissue lasers.
“…The present study evaluated comparatively some clinical outcomes of an HPL and the conventional scalpel technique for second-stage implant surgery. Despite the use of different techniques for it (e.g., scalpels, electrosurgery, and HPLs) (Tunc et al, 2019), HPLs have provided similar results when compared to the traditional ones with scalpels (Al-Delayme, 2019;Fornaini et al, 2015). Many studies on the use of HPL for oral soft tissue surgery are available but few assessed this matter especially.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Edentulism is a common clinical entity considered as an expected part of aging (Bajaj et al, 2020). Dental implants, a titanium surgical fixture with a root form and placed at the original position of natural teeth (Tunc et al, 2019), have been advocated in recent decades as an excellent option to treat tooth loss (Ibidem, 2020), changing Dentistry (Fornaini et al, 2015).…”
The present study aimed to compare the conventional scalpel technique and the use of a high-power diode laser for second-stage implant surgery. For that, fifteen patients were randomly assigned to receive either the conventional scalpel technique (Control Group, n = 7) or a diode laser-assisted technique (Laser Group, n = 8) for second-stage surgery of submerged dental implants placed at bone level. The local anesthetic amount required, and the total surgical time was determined just after surgery. Local pain, peri-implant mucosa status, and bleeding were assessed at the end of the surgery and after 7 and 15 days. Information on the need for postoperative pain medication on the first day and during the next two weeks was also gathered. The surgical time was significantly shorter in the Laser Group (P = 0.001) and only the Control Group presented bleeding at the end of surgery and on the seventh day (P = <0.001, P = 0.026). The other evaluations did not show differences between the groups. Within the limitations of the present pilot study and in comparison to clinical outcomes of the conventional scalpel technique, the use of a high-power diode laser seems to be slightly advantageous for the second-stage implant surgery.
“…Lasers, including semiconductor lasers are widely used in medicine. They are mainly used in soft tissue surgery for cutting and cauterization [ 1 , 2 ]. They are also used in biostimulation and photodynamic therapy [ 3 , 4 , 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wavelength of 2940 nm, characteristic for erbium-doped YAG lasers (Er:YAG), is in turn strongly absorbed by water and hydroxyapatite. Due to this, Er:YAG lasers are used for both soft tissue cutting and bone preparation [ 1 , 10 ]. Apart from wavelength, tissue response is affected by power, energy density and radiation dose.…”
Background: Lasers are widely used in medicine in soft and hard tissue surgeries and biostimulation. Studies found in literature typically compare the effects of single-wavelength lasers on tissues or cell cultures. In our study, we used a diode laser capable of emitting three components of visible light (640 nm, red; 520 nm, green; 450 nm, blue) and combining them in a single beam. The aim of the study was to assess the effects of laser radiation in the visible spectrum on tissue in vitro, depending on the wavelength and pulse width. Methods: All irradiations were performed using the same output power (1.5 W). We used various duty cycles: 10, 50, 80 and 100% with 100 Hz frequency. Maximum superficial temperature, rate of temperature increase and lesion depth were investigated. Results: Maximum superficial temperature was observed for 450 + 520 nm irradiation (100% duty cycle). The highest rate of increase of temperature was noted for 450 + 520 nm (100% duty cycle). Maximum lesion depth was observed in case of three-wavelength irradiation (450 + 520 + 640 nm) for 100, 80 and 50% duty cycles. Conclusions: The synergistic effect of two-wavelength (450 + 520 nm) irradiation was observed in case of maximum temperature measurement. The deepest depth of lesion was noted after three-wavelength irradiation (450 + 520 + 640 nm).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.