2016
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.14307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical, biophysical and immunohistochemical analysis of skin reactions to acute skin barrier disruption - a comparative trial between participants with sensitive skin and those with nonsensitive skin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
8
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found, however, significantly less mast cells in SS subjects compared to NSS subjects at 24 h after stimulus (À19.5, 95% CI: (À36.7;À2.4) (P = 0.029)), (Figs 1 and 2). This finding is in line with Richters et al studying skin responses to mechanical barrier disruption, in which a trend in a lower number of mast cells following stimulus in SS subjects was observed (10).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found, however, significantly less mast cells in SS subjects compared to NSS subjects at 24 h after stimulus (À19.5, 95% CI: (À36.7;À2.4) (P = 0.029)), (Figs 1 and 2). This finding is in line with Richters et al studying skin responses to mechanical barrier disruption, in which a trend in a lower number of mast cells following stimulus in SS subjects was observed (10).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These results confirm that the SC is vulnerable to surfactants, especially in SS. Other studies show that the SC is also vulnerable to mechanical stimulation, therefore suggesting that SS might be triggered by factors of different nature (10). As TEWL measurements were not able to discriminate between SS and NSS, it could mean that the SC structure might be malformed and establish a slightly impaired barrier at a level that is beyond sensitivity of traditional biophysical methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Potential participants were recruited via websites and asked to fill the novel perception-based questionnaire [17], as previously described [18,19,20]. Briefly, inclusion was based on self-assessed skin sensitivity and on a sensitive skin score obtained by rating skin perceptions (i.e., discomfort, stinging, redness, dryness) following exogenous and endogenous triggers (i.e., toiletries, shaving, heat, cold, clothes, emotions).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With as much as 50-61% women and 30-44% men reporting SS in the industrialized world, and consensus on the definition and pathomechanism remaining elusive despite extensive research [15], SS has been identified as a global challenge [16]. However, recent clinical studies, based on the selection of a SS and NSS panel according to a novel perception-based questionnaire [17] and on the application of in vivo skin models followed by clinical, biophysical, and immunohistochemical analysis, have shown that aberrant vascular and inflammatory reactions, accompanied by enhanced sensory reactivity, were the hallmarks of SS [18,19,20]. We thus hypothesized that the triple response elicited by histamine iontophoresis might differ between SS and NSS subjects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skin barrier function is affected in patients with extensive list of dermatological diseases including lamellar ichthyosis, psoriasis, Netherton syndrome, Chanarin-Dorfman and atopic dermatitis (AD) [10] and has been suggested to play a role in sensitive skin [11][12][13].…”
Section: Importance Of Skin Barrier Lipids and Water For Cosmetic-anmentioning
confidence: 99%