2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00087.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Assessment of Peri‐Implant Tissues in Patients with Varying Severity of Chronic Periodontitis

Abstract: Because of the greater loss of clinical attachment around implants placed in patients with generalized severe chronic periodontitis, close monitoring of these patients is suggested to prevent both development of peri-implantitis and recurrence of periodontal infection.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical observations of this study showed all 18 implants fixed after 9 months were considered successfully integrated at the time of the removal, and none showed any mobility [40] or signal of infection [21, 33, 41, 42] at sacrifice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The clinical observations of this study showed all 18 implants fixed after 9 months were considered successfully integrated at the time of the removal, and none showed any mobility [40] or signal of infection [21, 33, 41, 42] at sacrifice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The control patients were matched to cases for sex (19), age (±2 years) (49), and duration of follow-up (±2 months). The decision to match for these variables was based on the possibility of a correlation between increased duration of follow-up (corresponding to increased exposure time) and incidence of peri-implant pathology (50).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported prevalence of peri-implant pathology ranges from 12-43% (8). However, only a few studies have focused on the pathology and risk factors for periimplant pathology (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Las diferencias estructurales entre los implantes dentales y los dientes naturales, junto con la escasez de información científica, hacen que en los implantes dentales este tipo de exploración no sea tan útil, aunque se ha demostrado que el sondaje de los implantes dentales parece tener una mayor sensibilidad que el sondaje en los dientes naturales, probablemente porque la fuerza aplicada es excesiva. Por este motivo, al sondar los implantes se recomienda aplicar una fuerza que no supere los 0,15 Newtons para evitar falsas mediciones (78,(83)(84)(85)(86)(87)(88).…”
Section: Periimplantitisunclassified