Clinical and radiographic outcomes of implants immediately placed in fresh extraction sockets

A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least 1 year

“…There were 16 comparative studies. The test and control groups were recruited to compare (i) implants placed in extraction sockets vs. implants inserted at healed sites (Kan et al 2007a;Ribeiro et al 2008;Siciliano et al 2009;Gokcen-Rohlig et al 2010); (ii) immediate implants at sites with chronic periapical lesion vs. implants at healed sites (Lindeboom et al 2006a); (iii) immediate implant placement at sites with chronic periapical lesion vs. at sites without periapical lesion ); (iv) implants in acutely infected sockets vs. implants in sockets without pathology (Siegenthaler et al 2007); (v) immediate implant insertion and simultaneous connective tissue graft vs. coronally advanced flap ); (vi) treatment of immediate implant and connective tissue graft vs. immediate implant only (Bianchi & Sanfilippo 2004); (vii) immediate implantation with GBR vs. without GBR (Bragger et al 1996); (viii) submerged vs. non-submerged healing following implant placement in extraction sockets ); (ix) immediate vs. delayed provisional restoration after immediate implant placement (Crespi et al 2008;De Rouck et al 2009;Prosper et al 2010); (x) immediate implants restored with a platform-switching vs. a platform matching protocol (Crespi et al 2009a;Canullo et al 2009a,b).…”

“…Juodzbalys & Wang (2007) concluded that there was 1.16 mm bone loss 1 year after prosthetic restoration. Also, Gokcen-Rohlig et al (2010) revealed bone loss of 0.72 mm and 1.36 mm at 1-year and 2-year follow-up, respectively. It was reported that two of four implants in one patient, which were used to support a fixed complete denture, experienced suppuration on probing; however, the suppuration resolved following local debridement and institution of strict oral hygiene practices.…”

“…Implant-supported overdentures were also reported in three studies (Huys 2001;Gokcen-Rohlig et al 2010;Vidal et al 2010). All the implants were conventionally loaded.…”

“…Three studies used the bone level at the time of implant loading as the baseline (Juodzbalys & Wang 2007;Botticelli et al 2008;Gokcen-Rohlig et al 2010). Juodzbalys & Wang (2007) concluded that there was 1.16 mm bone loss 1 year after prosthetic restoration.…”

Revisión bibliográfica de Implantología Bucofacial del año 2010: Primera Parte

“…Además el implante inmediato suele ir asociado a un coste económico superior, ya que normalmente es necesario el uso de materiales de regeneración ósea para rellenar la incongruencia entre la morfología del alveolo dental y la del implante (86). Asimismo, el procedimiento es técnicamente más exigente que la técnica diferida tradicional y requiere que lo ejecute un profesional experimentado (80,87,88).…”