A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least 1 year

Lang, Niklaus P.; Pun, Lui; Lau, Ka Yee; Li, Ka Yan; Wong, May Chun Mei

doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02372.x

Cited by 337 publications

(445 citation statements)

References 127 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

396

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, a higher probability of midfacial recession can be expected in immediate implants in the anterior area (Chen & Buser, 2009). Lang et al (2012) have reported that, although major soft tissue changes occur during the first six months after implant placement, they may continue after this period. Interproximal papillae tend to increase with time but midfacially the soft tissue margin rather moves in an apical direction.…”

Section: Hard and Soft Tissue Changes After Immediate Implant Placementmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Bone volume changes after immediate implant placement with or without flap elevation

Mazzocco

Jimenez

Barallat

et al. 2016

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ADVERTIMENT. La consulta d'aquesta tesi queda condicionada a l'acceptació de les següents condicions d'ús: La difusió d'aquesta tesi per mitjà del servei TDX (www.tesisenxarxa.net) ha estat autoritzada pels titulars dels drets de propietat intel·lectual únicament per a usos privats emmarcats en activitats d'investigació i docència. No s'autoritza la seva reproducció amb finalitats de lucre ni la seva difusió i posada a disposició des d'un lloc aliè al servei TDX. No s'autoritza la presentació del seu contingut en una finestra o marc aliè a TDX (framing). Aquesta reserva de drets afecta tant al resum de presentació de la tesi com als seus continguts. En la utilització o cita de parts de la tesi és obligat indicar el nom de la persona autora.ADVERTENCIA. La consulta de esta tesis queda condicionada a la aceptación de las siguientes condiciones de uso: La difusión de esta tesis por medio del servicio TDR (www.tesisenred.net) ha sido autorizada por los titulares de los derechos de propiedad intelectual únicamente para usos privados enmarcados en actividades de investigación y docencia. No se autoriza su reproducción con finalidades de lucro ni su difusión y puesta a disposición desde un sitio ajeno al servicio TDR. No se autoriza la presentación de su contenido en una ventana o marco ajeno a TDR (framing). Esta reserva de derechos afecta tanto al resumen de presentación de la tesis como a sus contenidos. En la utilización o cita de partes de la tesis es obligado indicar el nombre de la persona autora. WARNING.On having consulted this thesis you're accepting the following use conditions: Spreading this thesis by the TDX (www.tesisenxarxa.net) service has been authorized by the titular of the intellectual property rights only for private uses placed in investigation and teaching activities. Reproduction with lucrative aims is not authorized neither its spreading and availability from a site foreign to the TDX service.Introducing its content in a window or frame foreign to the TDX service is not authorized (framing).

show abstract

Section: Hard and Soft Tissue Changes After Immediate Implant Placementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Lang et al (2012) performed a systematic review that included 2908 immediately placed implants with a mean follow-up of 2 years. The reported survival rate was 98.4% at two years, 97.5% at 3 years.…”

Section: Immediate Implant Placementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bone volume changes after immediate implant placement with or without flap elevation

Mazzocco

Jimenez

Barallat

et al. 2016

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, there are also some disadvantages, including the morphology of fresh extraction sockets and the inconsistency between the root anatomy and the shape of the dental implant, resulting in a discrepancy between the socket and the implant bed, which makes it more difficult to achieve primary implant stability. While in traditional implants the stability is provided by the contact of the implant with the newly formed bone in the socket, in immediate implant placement there is a bone defect, and stability can be obtained only by setting the implant in the apical part of the surgical site, in at least 4-5 mm of bone [5][6][7]. Moreover, we must also consider the residual bone defect between the implant and the walls of the socket and the processes of resorption and remodelling that occur after extraction [8].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors Influencing Immediate Maxillary Dental Implant Placement and Bone Resorption: A Review of the Literature and an Outlook on the Clinical Possibilities

Bianco¹

2016

Dent. Med. Probl.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The insertion of dental implants immediately after teeth extractions has become a routine clinical procedure in implant dentistry, despite difficulties derived from several factors influencing bone resorption. The aim of this study is to evaluate the survival rate of implant positioned immediately after tooth extraction in the upper maxilla and to analyze the surgical techniques and the parameters to minimize physiological bone resorption. An electronic search in MEDLINE (PubMed) and the Cochrane library was performed to analyze the factors that may influence physiological bone resorption during immediate implant placement: surgical technique, position of the implant and bone grafting. Immediate implant placement is a predictable technique with a high success rate. It does not prevent bone resorption subsequent to tooth extraction, but there are some parameters to take into account to minimize the bone resorption itself. Despite the high survival rate, more long-term studies are necessary to evaluate the success of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets in the upper maxillary. Special attention has to be given to aesthetic outcomes (Dent. Med. Probl. 2016, 53, 3, 408-412).

show abstract

“…Immediate implant placement (IIP) has some advantages compared with conventional treatment, in which a period between 3 and 6 months should be awaited before implant installation, such as reduced number of surgical procedures, shorter length of treatment, immediate function, potentially lower cost, and fewer restorations. [2][3][4] Although the survival rate observed for IIP is higher than 98% as evidenced in the previous study, 5 particularly attention should be paid to the esthetic outcomes. In the maxillary esthetic region, gingival recession and collapse of the alveolar process is a common complication after IIP due to multiple factors, i.e., thin gingival biotype, loss of buccal bone wall, surgical flap reflection, and delayed crown restoration.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Immediate Implant Placement with Simultaneous Regenerative Procedure in Fresh Extraction Socket

Molon¹

2017

World Journal of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim:The aim of this case report was to reconstruct the alveolar buccal bone plate lost in consequence of a root fracture in the maxillary central incisor area after immediate implant placement (IIP). A 48-year-old patient was referred to our office with the chief complaint of spontaneous bleeding in his left central incisor. After careful examination, the following comprehensive treatment approach was carried out: (1) Atraumatic tooth extraction, (2) IIP, (3) provisional prosthesis installation, (4) alveolar buccal bone plate reconstruction with autologous bone collected from the maxillary tuberosity, (5) gingival augmentation procedure with connective tissue graft removed from the palate, and finally (6) adjustment of the provisional restoration. After 1-year postoperative, an adequate esthetic outcome was achieved with lower cost, reduced morbidity to the patient, and lower treatment time. This approach was able to improve gingival architecture and bone volume with adequate thickness and width, enhancing patient esthetics and satisfaction. In conclusion, when proper diagnosis, precise surgical techniques, and appropriate multidisciplinary approach are employed, IIP followed by immediate dentoalveolar restoration might be considered a safe procedure to restore the peri-implant bone and gingival recession favoring the achievement of appropriate esthetic outcomes.Clinical significance: The treatment planning employed was able to improve gingival architecture and bone volume with sufficient width and thickness enhancing patient esthetics and satisfaction in one single-stage procedure.

show abstract

A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least 1 year

Abstract: Despite the high survival rate observed, more long-term studies are necessary to determine the success of implant treatment provided immediately after tooth extraction. Special attention has to be given to aesthetic outcomes.

Cited by 337 publications

References 127 publications

Bone volume changes after immediate implant placement with or without flap elevation

Bone volume changes after immediate implant placement with or without flap elevation

Factors Influencing Immediate Maxillary Dental Implant Placement and Bone Resorption: A Review of the Literature and an Outlook on the Clinical Possibilities

Immediate Implant Placement with Simultaneous Regenerative Procedure in Fresh Extraction Socket

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About