1995
DOI: 10.1002/lsm.1900170103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and preclinical photodynamic therapy

Abstract: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a treatment modality that utilizes a photosensitizing drug activated by laser generated light, and is proving effective for oncologic and nononcologic applications. This report provides an overview of photosensitizers, photochemistry, photobiology, and the lasers involved in photodynamic therapy. Clinical and preclinical PDT studies involving Photofrin and various second generation photosensitizers are reviewed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
221
0
9

Year Published

1996
1996
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 397 publications
(231 citation statements)
references
References 163 publications
1
221
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of Photofrin, as well as photosensitizers designated as 'second generation', investigations of dosing have used traditional pharmacokinetics to define times of maximum sensitizer concentration in tumours, maximum tumournormal tissue ratios, toxicity, metabolism, etc., as well as exploration of irradiation schema related to total fluence and fluence rates (Gomer, 1991;Henderson and Dougherty, 1992;Fisher et al, 1995). Unlike systemic administration of a photosensitizer, optimization of 6-ALA induction of protoporphyrin IX represents a different challenge because the photosensitizer is a product of a biosynthetic pathway that evolved to form haem, a non-photosensitizing end product.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of Photofrin, as well as photosensitizers designated as 'second generation', investigations of dosing have used traditional pharmacokinetics to define times of maximum sensitizer concentration in tumours, maximum tumournormal tissue ratios, toxicity, metabolism, etc., as well as exploration of irradiation schema related to total fluence and fluence rates (Gomer, 1991;Henderson and Dougherty, 1992;Fisher et al, 1995). Unlike systemic administration of a photosensitizer, optimization of 6-ALA induction of protoporphyrin IX represents a different challenge because the photosensitizer is a product of a biosynthetic pathway that evolved to form haem, a non-photosensitizing end product.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, malignant lesions are exposed to light of an appropriate wavelength and damage is usually the result of a photochemical reaction involving the conversion of oxygen to its highly toxic singlet state. However, prolonged skin photosensitivity and/or lack of specificity for malignant tissue are undesirable properties of many of the photosensitizers used in PDT (Dougherty et al, 1978;Bown, 1990;Overholt et al, 1993;Fisher et al, 1995). Recently, investigators have found that exogenous administration of 8-ALA to lesions can induce the accumulation of protoporphyrin IX (PPIX) (Malik and Laguci, 1987; Shoenfeld et al, 1994;Hua et al, 1995), an efficient photosensitizer (Kennedy et al, 1990).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photodynamic therapy (PDT), also called photochemotherapy, is a new modality for the treatment of cancer [1][2][3] and a variety of nononcologic conditions [3][4][5][6][7]. PDT is based on administering a photosensitizer, which is preferentially retained in tumor (and other proliferating) tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, Photofrin absorbs weakly at 630 nm and, moreover, is characterized by prolonged cutaneous phototoxicity. Second-generation photosensitizers for improved photochemotherapy are under development and are in various stages of preclinical and clinical trials [1,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been used successfully to control the growth of a variety of human malignancies (Rosenthal and Glatstein, 1994;van Hillegersberg et al, 1994;Fisher et al, 1995;Kriegmeir et al, 1996;Peng et al, 1997). Based on these clinical trials, PDT has been approved as a treatment for various cancers in the US, Canada, France, The Netherlands and Japan.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%