2012
DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivs460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes after implantation of the Trifecta aortic bioprosthesis: an initial single-centre experience

Abstract: The initial experience with the Trifecta valve bioprosthesis shows excellent outcomes with favourable early haemodynamics. Further studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm those preliminary results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
24
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
7
24
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For this evaluation, data of the 21 mm LDP was not considered, due to the low number of cases. Data for valve-sizes 23 mm and 25 mm were comparable to data published for the SJM Trifecta regarding pressure gradients, EOA and EOAI [7, 12]. In contrast, data for size 27 mm showed inferior results than the SJM Trifecta.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this evaluation, data of the 21 mm LDP was not considered, due to the low number of cases. Data for valve-sizes 23 mm and 25 mm were comparable to data published for the SJM Trifecta regarding pressure gradients, EOA and EOAI [7, 12]. In contrast, data for size 27 mm showed inferior results than the SJM Trifecta.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The postoperative course of most patients was uneventful. However, the need of permanent pacemakers in six patients was slightly higher than reported for the SJM Trifecta [7]. Moreover, there were eight patients requiring temporary dialysis postoperatively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…These other studies were conducted in different patient populations, less at risk for requiring reoperation for valve deterioration during their lifetime than patients with congenital heart disease, and they examined the use of the valve in the aortic position for which the valve prosthesis was designed. Dell’Aquila and colleagues [13] compared mean transvalvular gradients of the Trifecta valve with the Mosaic aortic bioprosthesis (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) and the Perimount valve among adult patients undergoing aortic valve replacement and found substantially reduced gradients associated with the Trifecta valve. Ruggieri and colleagues [14] also published their 3-year results using the Trifecta valve for aortic valve replacement in adult patients and found very low peak transvalvular gradients, even out to 3 years.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Гемодинамические характеристики рассматри-ваемых моделей также достоверно не различаются и сопоставимы с зарубежными аналогами [13,14]. Несмотря на то что в нашем исследовании мы ни в одном случае не наблюдали проблемы несоот-ветствия протез -пациент (площадь аортального отверстия, индексированная к ППТ, во всех случа-ях была больше 1 см 2 /м 2 ), при проведении регрес-сионного анализа отмечается прямая взаимосвязь между пиковым транспротезным градиентом и индексом массы тела.…”
Section: обсуждение результатовunclassified