2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2016.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Activity Monitoring System (CATS): An automatic system to quantify bedside clinical activities in the intensive care unit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, clinical severity scores do not necessarily encompass the complexity of nursing activities, which means that aspects of nursing work not directly related to the care for an individual patient are not taken into account. 18 A study that aimed to identify the nursing workload through the NAS and to verify its relationship with clinical and demographic variables of the patients revealed a weak correlation between workload (NAS) and severity index / risk of mortality through SAPS II (R=0.26), similar to the correlation shown here.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In addition, clinical severity scores do not necessarily encompass the complexity of nursing activities, which means that aspects of nursing work not directly related to the care for an individual patient are not taken into account. 18 A study that aimed to identify the nursing workload through the NAS and to verify its relationship with clinical and demographic variables of the patients revealed a weak correlation between workload (NAS) and severity index / risk of mortality through SAPS II (R=0.26), similar to the correlation shown here.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Another study developed and validated a Clinical Activity Tracking System (CATS), testing its use in both a simulated and actual ICU room. Like the previous study, more caregiving activity was reported between 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. compared to 11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. [221]. This system was validated against manual observation with a correlation of r = 0.882 [222].…”
Section: Quantification Of Workload In the Icumentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In a recent meta-analysis, the majority of recently developed and currently utilized workload scores were assessed either through comparison with other scores or by utilizing time-on-task measurements. 5 Attempts to use clinicians' tracking devices were undertaken to improve the workload calculation [29][30][31] ; however, perceived workload measurement relies on selfreporting and cannot be captured directly from the EHR or recorded by an external device.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%