2016
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2015.05.0341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climatology of New Particle Formation and Corresponding Precursors at Storm Peak Laboratory

Abstract: Thirteen years of measurements of ultrafine (3-10 nm diameter) aerosols are presented from a remote high elevation (3210 m a.s.l.) site in Colorado, Storm Peak Laboratory. Previous work has shown that frequent new particle formation (NPF) occurs regularly at the site (52% of days). This long-term climatology of ultrafine aerosols clearly shows a seasonal dependence on new particle formation at Storm Peak Laboratory, reaching a maximum during the spring season and a minimum in summer. Recent sulfur dioxide data… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the spring, the model predicts significant NPF in the fall (September-November) but unfortunately CN10 data is not available after Day 290. The predicted relatively high frequency of regional NPF events in the spring and fall is consistent with that derived from multiple-year NPF climatology analysis reported in Hallar et al (2016). As pointed out earlier, the pressure of SPL site (~690 mb) corresponds to the 7 th layer of the model which is around in the top of the boundary layer, consistent with the wellestablished almost daily transition from free-tropospheric to boundary layer air at the ridge-top site SPL (Obrist et al, 2008).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition to the spring, the model predicts significant NPF in the fall (September-November) but unfortunately CN10 data is not available after Day 290. The predicted relatively high frequency of regional NPF events in the spring and fall is consistent with that derived from multiple-year NPF climatology analysis reported in Hallar et al (2016). As pointed out earlier, the pressure of SPL site (~690 mb) corresponds to the 7 th layer of the model which is around in the top of the boundary layer, consistent with the wellestablished almost daily transition from free-tropospheric to boundary layer air at the ridge-top site SPL (Obrist et al, 2008).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The SPL site is an ideal location for long-term research on chemistryaerosol-cloud-radiation interactions as the ridge-top location produces almost daily transition from free-tropospheric to boundary layer air and thus allows for time-extended measurements of free tropospheric, in-cloud, and boundary layer air (Borys and Wetzel, 1997;Lowenthal et al, 2002). Both long-term and short-term intensive aerosol measurements have been made in SPL (e.g., Hallar et al, 2011;Friedman et al, 2013;Hallar et al, 2013Hallar et al, , 2016. In the present study, we use long-term total number concentrations of particles larger than 10 nm (CN10) obtained with a stand-alone TSI (model 3010) condensation particle counter (CPC).…”
Section: Spl Site Information and Aerosol Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The frequency, intensity, and duration of NPF events is highly variable according to the location where they are observed. The occurrence and characteristics of NPF episodes depend on various factors, including the emission strength of precursors, the number concentration of the pre-existing aerosol population, and meteorological parameters (in particular solar radiation, temperature, and relative humidity), which directly influence photo-chemical processes (Kulmala, 2003;Martin et al, 2010;Hallar et al, 2016). However, the relationship between these environmental parameters and the characteristics of NPF events is not fully understood and it is still a challenge to predict when an NPF event will take place and how intense it will be (Kulmala et al, 2004;Yu et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both aerosol size distribution and the aerosol chemical composition were shown to be fairly constant in time due to the long distance from aerosol sources, and, because of this consistency, climate relevant aerosol properties can be derived from these properties. Thirteen years of measurements of ultrafine (3-10 nm diameter) aerosols from Storm Peak Laboratory in Colorado were presented in Hallar et al (2016). Previous work has shown that frequent new particle formation occurs regularly at the site, and this long-term climatology of ultrafine aerosols clearly demonstrates a seasonal dependence on new particle formation at Storm Peak Laboratory, with a maximum during the spring season and a minimum in summer.…”
Section: Aerosol and Trace Gas Climatologymentioning
confidence: 99%