2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cliser.2021.100250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate service derived indicators to assess the impact of climate change on local river assimilative capacity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us denote this natural absorptive capacity at time t $t$ by X0. ${X}_{0}.$ Then, it follows that this natural capacity ought to be functionally related to the mean total reduction in the Ganges river's natural pollution absorbing capacity in the time interval false[0,tfalse] $[0,{t}]$ given in Equation (2). Let us express this functional relationship by writing X0=f{E[R(t)]}, ${X}_{0}=f\{E[R(t)]\},$where f{}<0. ${f}^{^{\prime} }\{\bullet \}\lt 0.$ Note that our mathematical description in Equation (4) of the relationship between X0 ${X}_{0}$ and E[R(t)] $E[R(t)]$ and the point that the function f{} $f\{\bullet \}$ is decreasing in the argument E[R(t)] $E[R(t)]$ are entirely consistent with our evidence based—see Farinosi et al (2019), Chapra et al (2021), and Ziogas et al (2021)—previous discussion of these matters in the first paragraph of Section 2. In addition and in words, what Equation (4) is telling us is intuitively plausible: If the mean total reduction in the natural pollution absorbing capacity up to time t $t$ increases then the Ganges river's actual natural capacity for absorbing pollution at time t $t$ decreases.…”
Section: The Model Of Water Pollutionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let us denote this natural absorptive capacity at time t $t$ by X0. ${X}_{0}.$ Then, it follows that this natural capacity ought to be functionally related to the mean total reduction in the Ganges river's natural pollution absorbing capacity in the time interval false[0,tfalse] $[0,{t}]$ given in Equation (2). Let us express this functional relationship by writing X0=f{E[R(t)]}, ${X}_{0}=f\{E[R(t)]\},$where f{}<0. ${f}^{^{\prime} }\{\bullet \}\lt 0.$ Note that our mathematical description in Equation (4) of the relationship between X0 ${X}_{0}$ and E[R(t)] $E[R(t)]$ and the point that the function f{} $f\{\bullet \}$ is decreasing in the argument E[R(t)] $E[R(t)]$ are entirely consistent with our evidence based—see Farinosi et al (2019), Chapra et al (2021), and Ziogas et al (2021)—previous discussion of these matters in the first paragraph of Section 2. In addition and in words, what Equation (4) is telling us is intuitively plausible: If the mean total reduction in the natural pollution absorbing capacity up to time t $t$ increases then the Ganges river's actual natural capacity for absorbing pollution at time t $t$ decreases.…”
Section: The Model Of Water Pollutionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Now, the Ganges, like all rivers, has a natural capacity for absorbing pollutants that are deposited into it 7 . However, the work of Farinosi et al (2019), Chapra et al (2021), and Ziogas et al (2021) tells us that with the onset of climate change, over time, river water flows are expected to decline and this, along with other factors, is very likely to probabilistically diminish the natural capacity of a river such as the Ganges to absorb pollutants that are deposited into it.…”
Section: The Assimilative Capacity Reduction Metricmentioning
confidence: 99%