Climate justice from a club good perspective

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to apply club good theory to challenges in climate justice and to identify the opportunities for creating a club of countries or regions to support climate justice and/or mitigate climate change, as well as the threats that such clubs could lead to the real exclusion of large parts of the world from climate justice. Design/methodology/approach A theoretical analysis is provided regarding the conditions for creating a club for climate change mitigation. Indicators of good governance and trust, as well as the Notre Dame Global Adaptation Index (ND-GAIN), are used to assess the capacity for creating such a club. Findings While opportunities for achieving climate justice are identified, climate change mitigation is likely to be at most a club good at the global level, thus excluding the most vulnerable countries, regions and groups of people. Although the threats of climate change may be acknowledged, they are easily neglected. Economic growth is likely to be a condition for economic sustainability, which in turn tends to be a condition for environmental sustainability. Decision makers should be conscious of the potential danger of creating a club for climate change mitigation based on the belief that economic growth and technology will solve these problems, as such a club is likely to be either unsustainable, or very small, while deepening existing injustice. Originality/value The authors provide an overview of the complexity of issues involved, to gain an appreciation of the vast, perhaps insurmountable, challenges facing climate justice. A club good approach is applied to issues of climate justice, emphasizing the limitations of the all-inclusiveness of climate justice and sustainable development.

Who takes responsibility for the climate refugees?

“…Consequently, due to the mismanagement at global and regional stages, the overall resilience process is being hampered at household to individual level in Bangladesh (Table II). On the basis of the above discussions, a total mismanagement is apparent in achieving global level resilience, which results in the need for the development of an action plan for addressing problems associated with climate refugees (Platje and Kampen, 2016). Amnesty International estimates that climatic extreme events will increase the number of people on the move across borders.…”

Effects of democracy, social inequality and economic growth on climate justice: An analysis with structural equation modelling

“…Emissions from fossil fuels detract from climate justice performance (Furlan & Mariano, 2021); in which case, non‐democratic countries can hamper the general public's participation in sustainable energy policy debates (Sovacool et al, 2017). Decisions in democracies may take longer, but they strengthen mitigation and resilience to climate change (Platje & Kampen, 2016).…”

“…In this way, the vulnerable individual will be more exposed to precarious environmental conditions, explaining the fact that social inequality reduces the climate justice of a country. Thus, it is essential that climate policies include issues of inequality; otherwise, there will be social exclusion related to information, health and income (Gutierrez & LePrevost, 2016; Platje & Kampen, 2016), prejudicing climate actions and keeping nations in negative cycles of climate justice issues (Furlan & Mariano, 2021).…”