Climate crisis and flying: social media analysis traces the rise of “flightshame”

Abstract

Even before the global halt to extensive mobility due to the coronavirus crisis, there has been growing resistance amongst some groups to flying. Reflecting increasing concern about the imminent climate emergency, the phenomenon of feeling ashamed of flying and expressing related emotions through communication has resulted in the neologism "flygskam". Drawing on 14,212 Twitter posts that contained "flygskam" and a further 1037 using the English "flightshame", this research examined the spatial-temporal spread of these words from Sweden starting in 2016 to the rest of the world indicating a global phenomenon. The findings indicate that national context continues to be important in understanding the nexus of individual and social sensemaking and processing of new information. They also demonstrate, however, that global networks (facilitated through social media) might challenge the needs of physical mobility as requirements to connect, exchange views, and create identity through peer group membership. Further analysis of the content revealed key perspectives and topics, providing insight into the relatively homogeneous discussions amongst a network community. Only 6% of posts rejected the notion, whilst the majority indicated support and advanced suggestions for more sustainable alternatives. It might be too early to say whether language behaviour expressed in online communication translates into real behaviour, but the current pandemic may well provide further impetus to no-fly movements by way of a strategic alliance between different peer groups.

Aviation policy instrument choice in Europe: high flying and crash landing? Understanding policy evolutions in the Netherlands and Germany

“…Finally, our comparative case study contributes to the broader research on sustainable transitions in which despite positive recent developments a deeper understanding of the policy process and related constellations of power interests and institutions, is still needed (Normann 2015;Köhler et al 2017). Aviation transport, in particular, can be understood as an increasingly symbolic area for this (Becken et al 2021) pointing to questions of to which extent and for what reasons the state enforces environmentally oriented regulation. From our analysis, explanations do not indicate any further turnaround in the ongoing priority struggle between environmental and economic considerations, while the back and forth on aviation taxes actually shows that politics here is by no means always problem-solving-oriented, but follows other rationalities.…”

Tourist behaviour in a COVID-19 world: a New Zealand perspective

“…In New Zealand, tourism was affected by COVID-19, with the events and meetings sectors affected more than others because of restrictions on the number of people attending events and social distancing regulations. At the same time, the word "zoom" entered the everyday language (Becken et al, 2021). A qualitative study by Becken and Hughey (2022, pp.…”

Kekhilafahan Islam, Globalisasi dan Gerilya Maya: Studi Kasus Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia

“…Meskipun secara pemahaman agama sangat konservatif, namun secara kemampuan mengoperasikan internet mereka sangat modern (Sabic-El-Rayess, 2021). Maka, tiga prasyarat dalam globalisasi yaitu material, spasio-temporal, dan kognitif (Becken, Friedl, Stantic, Connolly, & Chen, 2021) bisa ditafsirkan dengan baik oleh gerakan-gerakan radikalisme Islam. Radikalisme Islam secara aktif terlibat dalam perdagangan global demi keuntungan materi, kemudian seluruh aktivitas dan kejadian yang menimpa mereka turut berdampak secara menyeluruh pada masing-masing anggota di berbagai negara bagian.…”