2022
DOI: 10.15451/ec2022-06-11.15-1-24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate change will likely threaten areas of suitable habitats for the most relevant medicinal plants native to the Caatinga dry forest

Abstract: Disruption of ecosystem services associated with climate change may affect human well-being in different ways. Medicinal plants provide extremely relevant ecosystem services. Here, we tested the hypothesis that highly suitable habitats (i.e., suitability ≥ 0.8) for medicinal plants in Caatinga dry forest may be potentially contracted under scenarios of climate change, which are represented by different levels of increases in greenhouse gas emissions. We performed species distribution modelling to simulate the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, plants with larger SS are expected to expand their distribution area, with an estimated 19% increase in distribution area for every 1 cm increase in seed size (Table 1; Figure 5a). flora: Silva et al, 2019Silva et al, , 2022. Our results differ from these studies, as they show that most Caatinga species (58.4%) are likely to increase their distribution, which supports our first hypothesis.…”
Section: Re Sultscontrasting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, plants with larger SS are expected to expand their distribution area, with an estimated 19% increase in distribution area for every 1 cm increase in seed size (Table 1; Figure 5a). flora: Silva et al, 2019Silva et al, , 2022. Our results differ from these studies, as they show that most Caatinga species (58.4%) are likely to increase their distribution, which supports our first hypothesis.…”
Section: Re Sultscontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…Numerous studies indicate that Caatinga species may reduce their distribution area in the future (e.g., Cactaceae : Centeno‐Alvarado et al, 2022; Holoregmia viscida : Rabelo‐Costa et al, 2022; endemic flora: Silva et al, 2019, 2022). Our results differ from these studies, as they show that most Caatinga species (58.4%) are likely to increase their distribution, which supports our first hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation criteria for model prediction accuracy were categorized into four groups: poor (AUC<0.80), fair (0.80≤AUC<0.90), good (0.90≤AUC<0.95), and excellent (0.95≤AUC≤1.00). TSS evaluates a model's overall accuracy relative to random accuracy, with a TSS score exceeding 0.5 indicating optimal performance (Silva et al 2022).…”
Section: Accuracy Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TSS recognizes a model's overall accuracy based on its random accuracy, assigning a score between -1 and 1, with values close to 1 indicating optimal performance [25]. TSS values greater than 0.5 are considered adequate for informing model performance [26].…”
Section: Model Construction and Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%