2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10113-015-0915-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate change impacts on a pine stand in Central Siberia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future climate conditions, in particular in the long-term, could negatively affect the Pine's geographical distribution. This contraction in future ranges could likely be related to increasing drought stress, due to a positive temperature change according to Suckow et al (2016) findings. It is also reasonable to predict different responses for the most represented species of this genera: Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris), which is more tolerant to warmer temperature, could be less affected than Siberian pine (P. sibirica).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Future climate conditions, in particular in the long-term, could negatively affect the Pine's geographical distribution. This contraction in future ranges could likely be related to increasing drought stress, due to a positive temperature change according to Suckow et al (2016) findings. It is also reasonable to predict different responses for the most represented species of this genera: Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris), which is more tolerant to warmer temperature, could be less affected than Siberian pine (P. sibirica).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The model requires daily meteorological data, initial stand data and chemical and physical soil characteristics for each soil horizon. 4C has been used and validated to evaluate forest growth responses to climate in Finland (Mäkelä et al, 2000), Belgium (Kint et al, 2009), Germany (Lasch-Born et al, 2015), Europe (Reyer et al, 2014;Schelhaas et al, 2015) and Russia (Suckow et al, 2016).…”
Section: The Model 4cmentioning
confidence: 99%