2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.pce.2020.102939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate change impact on water availability in the olifants catchment (South Africa) with potential adaptation strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A multi-stage sampling technique was employed in this study, where a combination of sampling techniques was used to select the catchment and households in the catchment for interviews. In the first stage, the Olifants catchment was purposively selected from other catchments in South Africa because it is one of the most severely affected by climate change (Olabanji et al 2020). In the second stage, five districts were purposively selected in the Olifants catchment because they are the highest crop-producing districts with homogenous climate.…”
Section: Sampling Technique and Sample Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A multi-stage sampling technique was employed in this study, where a combination of sampling techniques was used to select the catchment and households in the catchment for interviews. In the first stage, the Olifants catchment was purposively selected from other catchments in South Africa because it is one of the most severely affected by climate change (Olabanji et al 2020). In the second stage, five districts were purposively selected in the Olifants catchment because they are the highest crop-producing districts with homogenous climate.…”
Section: Sampling Technique and Sample Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, values of R 2 if higher than 0.50 were considered as significant and acceptable [ 44 , 45 ] and values of R 2 higher than 0.70 were considered as strong [ 46 , 47 ]. In case of E , we considered only the positive estimates as negative estimates would indicate that the observed mean would be a better predictor in this context [ 48 ]. Consequently, we opted to use r as a representative for estimating the measures of association for the entire datasets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…would indicate that the observed mean would be a better predictor in this context [48]. Consequently, we opted to use r as a representative for estimating the measures of association for the entire datasets.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NSE is one of the most widely used statistics for validating water models, and many studies have found that NSE values of ≥0.6 are satisfactory, while values ≥0.75 are considered very good. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] The NSE determines how closely the observed and the simulated data fit the 1:1 line and, similarly, the R 2 measures variance between observed and simulated which indicates the fit of the model. 28 Models such as the Hydrological Simulation Program FORTRAN (HSPF) had NSE values of between 0.6 and 0.7 for analysis of monthly water temperatures in tropical rivers of southern Malaysia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%