2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2004.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate change and the effect of temperature backlashes causing frost damage in Picea abies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(45 reference statements)
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though we have had high natural leakage values from buds frozen to -5°C, increased leakage values definitely indicate severe damage from freezing. Since climate change might increase the frequency of temperature backlashes causing frost damage in spring (Jönsson et al 2004;Langvall 2011), it is increasingly important to consider the bud development patterns of provenances when choosing seed sources. In addition, actions to protect seedlings at the planting site should be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though we have had high natural leakage values from buds frozen to -5°C, increased leakage values definitely indicate severe damage from freezing. Since climate change might increase the frequency of temperature backlashes causing frost damage in spring (Jönsson et al 2004;Langvall 2011), it is increasingly important to consider the bud development patterns of provenances when choosing seed sources. In addition, actions to protect seedlings at the planting site should be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, fixed thresholds are of little use to evaluate frost risks. We have evaluated the frost damage risks for the A2 and B2 scenarios by using different indices which were based on: the start of dehardening in spring, the timing of bud burst, the severity of the temperature backlash, and the cold hardiness level (Jönsson et al 2004b). Indices were based on (1) the number of temperature backlashes after the onset of de-hardening, (2) accumulated degree days between the onset of de-hardening and a temperature < -2°C, (3) the number of temperature backlashes after bud burst, and (4) the number of days below a temperature-adjusted spring and autumn hardiness level (cf.…”
Section: Drought and Frost Damage As Preconditioning Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indices were based on (1) the number of temperature backlashes after the onset of de-hardening, (2) accumulated degree days between the onset of de-hardening and a temperature < -2°C, (3) the number of temperature backlashes after bud burst, and (4) the number of days below a temperature-adjusted spring and autumn hardiness level (cf. Jönsson et al 2004b).…”
Section: Drought and Frost Damage As Preconditioning Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…with sudden frost episodes is high (Myking, 1997;Jönsson et al, 2004;Cannell and Smith, 1986). The main reason for this is the higher incidence of cold air masses, as well as more extensive radiative cooling under cloud-free situations during the longer nights early in the year.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%