Abstract:What does climate change mean for the field of industrial relations? In this article, we argue that a meaningful disciplinary response to climate change requires more than simply widening the scope of industrial relations scholarship to include environmental dynamics. It demands recognition of the ways in which the categories of analysis and intellectual preoccupations of the discipline have been shaped by what we term the ‘fossil capitalist inertia’ exerted by their largely 20th-century origins. Climate chang… Show more
“…Trade unions’ relationship to the environment is an area of increasing interdisciplinary interest including contributions from industrial relations scholars and the emerging field of environmental labor studies (Flanagan and Goods, 2022; Räthzel et al, 2021; Ringqvist, 2022; Uzzell and Räthzel, 2013a). Prominent accounts in the literature, which are predominantly qualitative studies with a particular focus on the level of union policy, point to recurring dilemmas between jobs and environmental protection (Räthzel and Uzzell, 2011; Thomas and Doerflinger, 2020).…”
Section: Union Membership and Environmental Spending Support In Compa...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While unemployment levels are not readily comparable across developed and developing economies in ways serving present purposes (ILO, 2019), semi-periphery and periphery states face systematic disadvantages in their capacity to protect workers against various labor market-related risks (e.g., Silver, 2003: 80–81), as reflected, for example, in the unequal impact of the COVID-19 pandemic across world systems positions (Valizade et al, 2023). One potentially important factor to consider in this regard is the strength of ALMPs, that is, policies designed to assist unemployed workers to reskill and find new employment (e.g., Valizade et al, 2023), which ties into debates concerning the importance of a “just transition” for workers not to perceive environmental agendas as threats to their material interests (Flanagan and Goods, 2022: 483; Kalt, 2022: 513; Uzzell and Räthzel, 2013b).…”
Section: Union Membership and Environmental Spending Support In Compa...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is growing interest in the relationship between trade unions and the environment, as reflected in a recent special issue of this journal (Flanagan and Goods, 2022). Early assumptions concerning union members’ reluctance to embrace environmental agendas have been contested (Chen, 2017).…”
This article contributes to debates about trade unions and the environment by studying international variation in the association between union membership and support for government spending on environmental protection. Building on research which demonstrates a positive membership effect on support for environmental protection, the article extends the geographical scope beyond the more economically developed contexts studied previously. Using World Systems Theory as a comparative framework, distinguishing between core, semi-periphery, and periphery states, the article explores whether the positive membership effect extends beyond more affluent core states and reveals an intriguing empirical puzzle: while public support for environmental spending is substantially weaker in core states relative to non-core states, the latter being subject to more extensive environmental threats, the reverse holds for the membership effect on environmental spending support which instead tends to be more positive in core states. Union membership thus tends to have the largest positive impact on environmental spending support in countries where public support for such spending tends to be lower. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings for the global effort to address an ongoing environmental crisis are discussed by considering the notion of a solidarity effect.
“…Trade unions’ relationship to the environment is an area of increasing interdisciplinary interest including contributions from industrial relations scholars and the emerging field of environmental labor studies (Flanagan and Goods, 2022; Räthzel et al, 2021; Ringqvist, 2022; Uzzell and Räthzel, 2013a). Prominent accounts in the literature, which are predominantly qualitative studies with a particular focus on the level of union policy, point to recurring dilemmas between jobs and environmental protection (Räthzel and Uzzell, 2011; Thomas and Doerflinger, 2020).…”
Section: Union Membership and Environmental Spending Support In Compa...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While unemployment levels are not readily comparable across developed and developing economies in ways serving present purposes (ILO, 2019), semi-periphery and periphery states face systematic disadvantages in their capacity to protect workers against various labor market-related risks (e.g., Silver, 2003: 80–81), as reflected, for example, in the unequal impact of the COVID-19 pandemic across world systems positions (Valizade et al, 2023). One potentially important factor to consider in this regard is the strength of ALMPs, that is, policies designed to assist unemployed workers to reskill and find new employment (e.g., Valizade et al, 2023), which ties into debates concerning the importance of a “just transition” for workers not to perceive environmental agendas as threats to their material interests (Flanagan and Goods, 2022: 483; Kalt, 2022: 513; Uzzell and Räthzel, 2013b).…”
Section: Union Membership and Environmental Spending Support In Compa...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is growing interest in the relationship between trade unions and the environment, as reflected in a recent special issue of this journal (Flanagan and Goods, 2022). Early assumptions concerning union members’ reluctance to embrace environmental agendas have been contested (Chen, 2017).…”
This article contributes to debates about trade unions and the environment by studying international variation in the association between union membership and support for government spending on environmental protection. Building on research which demonstrates a positive membership effect on support for environmental protection, the article extends the geographical scope beyond the more economically developed contexts studied previously. Using World Systems Theory as a comparative framework, distinguishing between core, semi-periphery, and periphery states, the article explores whether the positive membership effect extends beyond more affluent core states and reveals an intriguing empirical puzzle: while public support for environmental spending is substantially weaker in core states relative to non-core states, the latter being subject to more extensive environmental threats, the reverse holds for the membership effect on environmental spending support which instead tends to be more positive in core states. Union membership thus tends to have the largest positive impact on environmental spending support in countries where public support for such spending tends to be lower. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings for the global effort to address an ongoing environmental crisis are discussed by considering the notion of a solidarity effect.
“…Dit autrement, la transition sera-t-elle vraiment écologique et sociale ? On peut d'ores et déjà penser que cela dépendra de la capacité des actrices et acteurs économiques à investir et des actrices et acteurs syndicaux à négocier les mutations (Flanagan, goods, 2022), pour que soient reconnues les compétences, défendues les conditions de travail et les rémunérations. Cela dépendra également de la façon dont le droit du travail et les politiques de l'emploi ou de la formation accompagnent et responsabilisent les travailleurs et les travailleuses, leur permettant de choisir et d'agir (lallement, zimmermann, 2019) quel que soit le type d'organisation au sein de laquelle ils et elles travaillent.…”
Section: Comprendre L'émergence Et Les Transformations Des Emplois Et...unclassified
CRIISEA (Centre de recherches sur l'industrie, les institutions et les systèmes économiques d'Amiens), Université Picardie Jules Verne, et Centre d'études de l'emploi et du travail (CEET) ;
“…Here, the literature and policy-makers have used the concept of a ‘just transition’ in specific reference to this shift and its impact on industrial relations. The increased use of digital technologies requires worker involvement in management decision-making processes, for example regarding the introduction of artificial intelligence (AI) (Eisenberg, 2019; Flanagan and Goods, 2022), with worker voice strengthened through social dialogue, employee participation and representation structures designed to help manage and anticipate restructuring (e.g. Gumbrell-McCormick and Hyman, 2013; Pulignano and Stewart, 2013; Pulignano et al, 2007).…”
This article examines union strategies towards the twin digital and green transitions, comparing the German and Belgian automotive industries. The drive towards net-zero and more digital economies is manifested through the move from fossil fuel-powered cars to electric cars, engendering a reorganisation of production, work and employment among car manufacturers. We identified two strategic union response patterns. While German unions are developing proactive strategies and proposals to influence and shape the ongoing transition of the automotive industry, Belgian unions are more passive, reacting primarily to management proposals and focusing narrowly on employment and working conditions without a broader strategy on how to influence the transformation of the automotive industry. We explain the observed cross-national differences by two factors: the importance of national institutions, i.e., the varying integration of labour into management decision-making, and the role of union knowledge regimes. The latter refers to internal union organisations and structures such as research departments, research institutes and foundations tasked with providing own research and funding external research on change topics from a union perspective, publishing studies and developing programmatic agendas, and disseminating the knowledge to union members through training, workshops and conferences.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.