2011
DOI: 10.1257/aer.101.6.2687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clearing the Air? The Effects of Gasoline Content Regulation on Air Quality

Abstract: This paper examines whether US gasoline content regulations, which impose substantial costs on consumers, have successfully reduced ozone pollution. We take advantage of spatial and temporal variation in the regulations' implementation to show that federal gasoline standards, which allow refiners flexibility in choosing a compliance mechanism, did not improve air quality. This outcome occurred because minimizing the cost of compliance does not reduce emissions of those compounds most prone to forming ozone. In… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
124
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 234 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(21 reference statements)
2
124
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concentrations of O 3 and O 3 -producing precursors have decreased in the United States (21), accounting for the reductions in O 3 damage seen here. There is controversy over whether regulatory policies influence air quality, with evidence that some policies have clear effects but other policies have little or no effect (22) (Fig. 1) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concentrations of O 3 and O 3 -producing precursors have decreased in the United States (21), accounting for the reductions in O 3 damage seen here. There is controversy over whether regulatory policies influence air quality, with evidence that some policies have clear effects but other policies have little or no effect (22) (Fig. 1) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, column (5) tests robustness in two directions. First, we specify additional flexible meteorological controls (Auffhammer and Kellogg, 2011), namely: (i) cubic polynomials in the maximum and minimum temperature, humidity and wind speed, and the maximum precipitation rate, in the contemporaneous 8-hour shift, allowing these cubic polynomials to vary by timeof-day; (ii) pairwise interactions for all linear terms in (i); and (iii) linear controls for the maximum and minimum temperature, humidity and wind speed, and the maximum precipitation rate, observed in the 24-hour period that precedes the start of the shift.…”
Section: Empirical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 For example, if a weather station exits from a warmer part of a county, temperature in that county may erroneously 14 To address concerns about observable station entry and exit, Auffhammer and Kellogg (2011) and Schlenker and Roberts (2009) develop an approach that addresses station entry and attrition by estimating missing values in the station record, then using a balanced panel constructed from the "patched" station data. appear to decrease.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%