1988
DOI: 10.1306/212f8e36-2b24-11d7-8648000102c1865d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clast measurement; a simple manual device and its semiautomatic electronic equivalent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
3

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The pebble-box was developed by Ibbeken and Denzer (1988) who conducted several large studies of gravel particle shapes. The pebble-box is a convenient device for easy measurements of the three particle axes because it does not require repositioning the particles between measurements, as ruler measurements do, and ensures all three measured particle axes are at right angles.…”
Section: Pebble-boxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pebble-box was developed by Ibbeken and Denzer (1988) who conducted several large studies of gravel particle shapes. The pebble-box is a convenient device for easy measurements of the three particle axes because it does not require repositioning the particles between measurements, as ruler measurements do, and ensures all three measured particle axes are at right angles.…”
Section: Pebble-boxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is adifference in sphericity between rock types, but no significant changes during transport. Figure 13 shows the corresponding sphericities for the two petrographic groups, which were measured with a simple mechanical device (Ibbeken & Denzer, 1988). As expected, there are no significant changes during transportation.…”
Section: Field Investigationmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In this regard, bidimensional concepts have been described in the geological literature as the ‘maximum projection plane’ (Krumbein ). Most recently, they have been used for bidimensional representations as the ‘smallest projected area’ (McLane ), or for three‐dimensional representations as the ‘pebble box’ (Ibbeken and Denzer ), the ‘enclosing box’ (McLane ) or the ‘smallest box’ (Blott and Pye ), amongst others.…”
Section: Methods Of Spatial Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, bidimensional concepts have been described in the geological literature as the 'maximum projection plane' (Krumbein 1941). Most recently, they have been used for bidimensional representations as the 'smallest projected area' (McLane 1995), or for threedimensional representations as the 'pebble box' (Ibbeken and Denzer 1988), the 'enclosing box' (McLane 1995) or the 'smallest box' (Blott and Pye 2008), amongst others. In the archaeological literature, the bidimensional concept has been applied to the products of the prehistoric lithic industry by some prehistorians as the 'rectangle minimal' (Laplace 1974a).…”
Section: The Dimensions As Representation Axesmentioning
confidence: 99%