2017
DOI: 10.1002/asi.23937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classifying tumor event attributes in radiology reports

Abstract: Radiology reports contain vital diagnostic information that characterizes patient disease progression. However, information from reports is represented in free text, which is difficult to query against for secondary use. Automatic extraction of important information, such as tumor events using natural language processing, offers possibilities in improved clinical decision support, cohort identification, and retrospective evidence-based research for cancer patients. The goal of this work was to classify tumor e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Naïve Bayes was the second most frequent approach, being used to predict heart disease in medical records [30,80], classify smoking status [52], search EMR records to identify multiple sclerosis [106], and classify EMR records for obesity [86] and cancer [60,65,67]. CRFs are the third most frequent approach, have been used to predict heart disease in medical records [29,32], identify EHR progress notes pertaining to diabetes [85], categorize breast radiology reports [22], and identify tumor attributes in radiology reports [63]. Lastly, random forests were used for predicting heart disease [53], classifying cancer types [60], and identifying hypertension [49].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naïve Bayes was the second most frequent approach, being used to predict heart disease in medical records [30,80], classify smoking status [52], search EMR records to identify multiple sclerosis [106], and classify EMR records for obesity [86] and cancer [60,65,67]. CRFs are the third most frequent approach, have been used to predict heart disease in medical records [29,32], identify EHR progress notes pertaining to diabetes [85], categorize breast radiology reports [22], and identify tumor attributes in radiology reports [63]. Lastly, random forests were used for predicting heart disease [53], classifying cancer types [60], and identifying hypertension [49].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apoptosis/necrosis, as well as micronuclei formation, were also investigated as common endpoints during radiobiological studies. As an experimental model, the MRC-5 cell line was used, which represents well-characterized human normal fibroblasts approved for radiobiological research [15] and is an appropriate model system for studying early and late radiation effects [16,17,18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e.g., [28][29][30][31][32][33]. Studies focused on tumour information e.g., for liver [34] and hepatocellular carcinoma (HPC) [35,36] and one study on extracting information relevant for structuring subdural haematoma characteristics in reports [37].…”
Section: Diagnostic Surveillancementioning
confidence: 99%